Re: Maven 3.9.x plugins verifications

Hi Le jeu. 15 juin 2023 à 21:15, Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Hi > > Next my propositions for reporting Plugin Validation issues. > Improve reporting [1] and documentation [2] > > I see many benefits when we show "external" issues to users. > Many times plugin authors don't care or don't kn

Re: Maven 3.9.x plugins verifications

Hi Next my propositions for reporting Plugin Validation issues. Improve reporting [1] and documentation [2] I see many benefits when we show "external" issues to users. Many times plugin authors don't care or don't know how to make theirs plugins better, ready for next Maven versions and so on W

Re: Maven 3.9.x plugins verifications

On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 7:44 AM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > In current 3.9.x we have: > > - NONE, // mute validation completely (validation issue collection still > happens, it is just not reported!) > - INLINE, // inline, each "internal" problem one line next to mojo > invocation > - SUMMARY,

Re: Maven 3.9.x plugins verifications

Hi, I think that introducing property is better than changing logging levels. Everything is reported by one class so we don't have the possibility of what information and how it should be reported. So I would like to think again what options we have and what for? In current 3.9.x we have: - N

Re: Maven 3.9.x plugins verifications

Howdy, did locally a change that any validation issues are always reported in DEBUG (left remains as before). Here is an example output: https://gist.github.com/cstamas/277a5c8b400af917e784a8b0f3f3db26 Simply put, DEBUG is always logged (for any kind), and if you use commands like in gist (or tw

Re: Maven 3.9.x plugins verifications

+1, guess it should be off by default and on in verbose/-X. If user always want to see it or see only a subpart tunning is fine IMHO. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: Maven 3.9.x plugins verifications

Howdy, well, am starting to think we should just use different loggers for these (by locality) and let users tweak logging as they wish? Or any other idea? Thanks T On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 2:44 PM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > We have some of discussion about this feature in 3.9.2 > > I saw som

Maven 3.9.x plugins verifications

We have some of discussion about this feature in 3.9.2 I saw some negative opinions ... Maybe I am missing something I think that people's nature is that when they don't like something they will speak about it ... but when people like something don't speak about it. So I would like to say that I