Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 30 January 2010 02:38, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > > > could we use "milestone" as names in replacement for "alpha", so that we > get > > more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? > > > > I can understand the difficu

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 2010-01-29, at 5:02 PM, Gustavo Hexsel wrote: > Just as a side note: in most projects, alpha implies that changes in > features or public APIs is possible or likely. Maybe it's not the case for > Maven... > From the CLI perspective nothing should change, so from that perspective there is

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Gustavo Hexsel
Just as a side note: in most projects, alpha implies that changes in features or public APIs is possible or likely. Maybe it's not the case for Maven... []s Gus On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > > > could we use

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > could we use "milestone" as names in replacement for "alpha", so that we get > more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? > > I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with "alpha" in > version name. Wo

Re: Re : Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Stephane Nicoll
ink there is a chance this issue will be fixed in Maven 2.2.x? I > fear the answer will be => fixed in Maven 3... > > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/us...@maven.apache.org/msg94040.html > > > > - Message d'origine > > De : Stephane Nicoll > >

Re : Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Julien HENRY
ttp://www.mail-archive.com/us...@maven.apache.org/msg94040.html - Message d'origine > De : Stephane Nicoll > À : Maven Developers List > Envoyé le : Ven 29 Janvier 2010, 15 h 14 min 59 s > Objet : Re: Maven 3 alpha status > > Which bug are your talking about? Ha

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread nicolas de loof
could we use "milestone" as names in replacement for "alpha", so that we get more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with "alpha" in version name. Would you install Windows 8 alpha on your @work computer ? ;) 2

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Which bug are your talking about? Have you filled something in Jira? S. On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency > with type "xml.zip". This dependency was declared in another module of the > reac

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 2010-01-29, at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency > with type "xml.zip". This dependency was declared in another module of the > reactor, and was a dependency of a plugin (maven-andromda-plugin). So there > is

Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Julien HENRY
Hi, Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency with type "xml.zip". This dependency was declared in another module of the reactor, and was a dependency of a plugin (maven-andromda-plugin). So there is no reason that the ear plugin "see" this dependency. As I rea