Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread John Casey
hing though :) Cheers, Brett -john Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi John, I tried RC4 under javadoc plugin and I have now 3 ITs failures on my side: MJAVADOC-172 MJAVADOC-180 MJAVADOC-194 Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/31 John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I've got a new release candidate f

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread John Casey
ew release candidate for people to try out: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ Major changes: - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 - Improved handling of mirror definitions without an element The only outstanding potential

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread Brett Porter
I've got a new release candidate for people to try out: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ Major changes: - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 - Improved handling of mirror definitions without an element The only outstanding pot

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread John Casey
it'd be a simple enough operation to lookup the timestamp on the RCs on my staging repo, and do a date-based search using those values... What's the value in providing this level of resolution, though? Paul Benedict wrote: Brett, I know those discussions existed. I was apart of them :-) and I

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread Vincent Siveton
OC-194 >>> Cheers, >>> Vincent >>> 2008/7/31 John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've got a new release candidate for people to try out: >>>> >>>> >>>> ht

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread John Casey
John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I've got a new release candidate for people to try out: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ Major changes: - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 - Improved handling of mirror de

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread Brett Porter
e: Hi John, I tried RC4 under javadoc plugin and I have now 3 ITs failures on my side: MJAVADOC-172 MJAVADOC-180 MJAVADOC-194 Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/31 John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I've got a new release candidate for people to try out: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/sta

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
No more problem - builds fine on my projects. :-) - Fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:50 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a new release candidate for people to try out: > > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stag

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread Mauro Talevi
John Casey wrote: Hi, I've got a new release candidate for people to try out: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ Major changes: - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 - Improved handling of mirror definitions witho

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: What are the errors in javadoc tests ? MJAVADOC-210, the plugin was searching for tools.jar which isn't found on Mac, so the unit test to check the auto-detection of taglets failed. I'm building it successfuly on Mac OS X. Strange. How about the ITs, do they fail f

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-08-01 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a new release candidate for people to try out: > > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/mave

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Brett Porter
Ah :) perhaps "fixed in RCx" as the last comment is enough? - Brett On 01/08/2008, at 1:35 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: Brett, I know those discussions existed. I was apart of them :-) and I recommended we should not create extra JIRA versions for 1 and 2 tickets. My question this time, however

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Paul Benedict
Brett, I know those discussions existed. I was apart of them :-) and I recommended we should not create extra JIRA versions for 1 and 2 tickets. My question this time, however, is a bit different. I just wanted to know if we should somehow mark the ticket with RC1, RC2, etc. within the version just

RE: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Brian E. Fox
To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4 Yes, I believe this would be a good candidate to push to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll put together the message now. It's worth remembering that we may have a problem expressed somewhere in the javadoc plugin, so this may not be the last R

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Benjamin, For the first one, I guess that javadoc:javadoc was not call from core. For jdk6, I have no clue about BSH but I noticed that maven-javadoc-plugin version is 2.4 and not 2.5-snap. Thanks to have a glance :) Vincent 2008/7/31 Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Vincent Siveton

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Vincent Siveton wrote: I tried RC4 under javadoc plugin and I have now 3 ITs failures on my side: MJAVADOC-172 MJAVADOC-180 MJAVADOC-194 MJAVADOC-180 is a strange one: The IT's verify.bsh is run only if System.getProperty( "java.specification.version" ).equals( "1.5" ) ?? Anyway, I run "mvn

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Brett Porter
We already had that discussion and decided it would be overkill - once 2.0.10 is released nobody will be concerned with the difference between these release candidates (And they won't be available for download any more anyway). There are few enough changes between each that you can use time

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread John Casey
didate for people to try out: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ Major changes: - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 - Improved handling of mirror definitions without an element The only outstanding potential issue has

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread John Casey
o try out: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ Major changes: - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 - Improved handling of mirror definitions without an element The only outstanding potential issue has something to do with the MJAVADOC-172

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Rahul Thakur
OTOH, there is a 'Fix Version' property in JIRA that you can use to assign a release/build/version id. Rahul On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there anywhere in JIRA we can tag some issues as being fixed in RC1, RC2, > etc.? I liked how Bugzilla had fla

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Paul Benedict
Is there anywhere in JIRA we can tag some issues as being fixed in RC1, RC2, etc.? I liked how Bugzilla had flags to mark items. Anything like that in JIRA? Paul On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would this be a good one to push to users@, particularly hi

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Brett Porter
http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ Major changes: - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 - Improved handling of mirror definitions without an element The only outstanding potential issue has something to do with the MJAVADO

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread Vincent Siveton
.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ > > Major changes: > > - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 > - Improved handling of mirror definitions without an element > > The only outstanding potential issue has something to do with

Maven 2.0.10-RC4

2008-07-31 Thread John Casey
Hi, I've got a new release candidate for people to try out: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC4/ Major changes: - Bumped wagon version to 1.0-beta-4 - Improved handling of mirror definitions without an element The