Re: Maven's future repository support

2008-03-20 Thread Gilles Scokart
not sure > > how that would happen. It seems like this data needs to be stored in the > > repo itself and then cached in the local repo. Otherwise someone would > > have to provide a redirection service which isn't feasible for all > > repos. > > > >

Re: Maven's future repository support

2008-03-18 Thread Tamás Cservenák
repo itself and then cached in the local repo. Otherwise someone would > have to provide a redirection service which isn't feasible for all > repos. > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 16, 20

RE: Maven's future repository support

2008-03-16 Thread Brian E. Fox
ch 16, 2008 7:06 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Maven's future repository support Forking the other thread. Maven still needs to work properly without a repository manager (even if it is a good practice to use one). In my opinion, that means: - proper unique identifiers for repos

Re: Maven's future repository support

2008-03-16 Thread Nigel Magnay
That sounds good to me, and I see where the identifiers have come in; I think you could do without them though, and just use the repository URI as the identifier :- For 'external' mirrors, accessed directly and not through a repo manager: Say you have repo1.maven.org/maven2, and global mirrors of

Maven's future repository support

2008-03-16 Thread Brett Porter
Forking the other thread. Maven still needs to work properly without a repository manager (even if it is a good practice to use one). In my opinion, that means: - proper unique identifiers for repositories (my preference would actually be to control this by group ID, but I see too many counte