On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 3:57 PM Matthias Bünger
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree that PR's getting more and more difficult to handle when they
> are inactive, but issues and bugs are normally not gone/fixed by
> waiting, so I won't auto close them.
>
I thought we were only auto-closing issues that were
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 16:57, Matthias Bünger
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree that PR's getting more and more difficult to handle when they
> are inactive, but issues and bugs are normally not gone/fixed by
> waiting, so I won't auto close them.
We can only add the label "Stale" to issues and don't cl
Hi,
I agree that PR's getting more and more difficult to handle when they
are inactive, but issues and bugs are normally not gone/fixed by
waiting, so I won't auto close them.
As written during the GitHub migration discussion by several others: We
need to triage them regulary. Yes this is work,
Hi,
I added shared GitHub action to management stale - old issues and PRs.
In first step I add an automation for items with label:
waiting-for-feedback, and we have for such items:
- will mark as stale after 60 days
- will close after next 30 days
- items with milestone or labels `priority:blocke
