On Apr 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Could this be slated for beta-2? And if it is decided to be not the
> right time, bump it to 3.1?
>
I think we should focus on fixing issues for 3.0, but that doesn't mean we
can't start thinking and making prototypes for other features.
>
Could this be slated for beta-2? And if it is decided to be not the
right time, bump it to 3.1?
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> However, it is important to be able to change the settings.xml file in
>> future, and the best way to do that and st
Brett Porter wrote:
However, it is important to be able to change the settings.xml file in future,
and the best way to do that and still support Maven 2 is by having a second
location. Is Maven 3 already forwards compatible with reading the settings
file? If not yet, I wouldn't consider this
On 23/04/2010, at 5:08 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
> The neat-nick in me says no, but I'm also not going to rename
> repo1.maven.org/maven2 to /maven3 either. I'm just playing devil's
> advocate here to point out that there are additional considerations
> than simply changing the maven core logic.
Same
The neat-nick in me says no, but I'm also not going to rename
repo1.maven.org/maven2 to /maven3 either. I'm just playing devil's
advocate here to point out that there are additional considerations
than simply changing the maven core logic.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> B
Brian,
Then the current situation should be viewed as acceptable? The ".m2"
directory, although an artifact of Maven 2, continues to be the home
directory for Maven 3.
Paul
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
>> What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be a
FAIL! I was a bit too late :)
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
> > What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
> > easy upgrade path. My point is, it's odd Maven 3 has an "m2" user
> > directory -- nothing technically incorrect; just a vestigial of
the ramifications for
> > all the tools that would have to be updated. Is it worth it?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Paul Benedict
> wrote:
> >> 3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was
> >> wondering can MNG-4483 be a
> What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
> easy upgrade path. My point is, it's odd Maven 3 has an "m2" user
> directory -- nothing technically incorrect; just a vestigial of
> progress.
Because now every tool that cares about this folder needs to implement
that same
1) check if .mvn exists
2) if .mvn doesn't exist then check if .m2 exists
3) if .m2 doesn't exist then create .mvn and use it
++
Julien
- Message d'origine
> De : Wendy Smoak
> À : Maven Developers List
> Envoyé le : Jeu 22 avril 2010, 18 h 16 min 46 s
>
his sounds easy on the maven side, but what are the ramifications for
> all the tools that would have to be updated. Is it worth it?
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> 3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was
>> wonder
This sounds easy on the maven side, but what are the ramifications for
all the tools that would have to be updated. Is it worth it?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> 3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was
> wondering can MNG-4483 be a
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, nicolas de loof
wrote:
> +1 for .mvn and backward compatibility with .m2 if not found
Wouldn't it _create_ .mvn if it's not found? Otherwise what's going
to happen the first time you use m3 on a new machine?
--
Wendy
--
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > - Message d'origine
> > > De : Paul Benedict
> > > À : Maven Developers List
> > > Envoyé le : Jeu 22 avril 2010, 17 h 14 min 15 s
> > > Objet : MNG-4483
> > >
> > > 3.0-beta-1 being a beta
+1 for .mvn and backward compatibility with .m2 if not found
2010/4/22 Julien HENRY
> +1
>
>
>
> - Message d'origine
> > De : Paul Benedict
> > À : Maven Developers List
> > Envoyé le : Jeu 22 avril 2010, 17 h 14 min 15 s
> > Objet : MNG-
+1
- Message d'origine
> De : Paul Benedict
> À : Maven Developers List
> Envoyé le : Jeu 22 avril 2010, 17 h 14 min 15 s
> Objet : MNG-4483
>
> 3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was
wondering
> can MNG-4483 be addressed? I
3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was
wondering can MNG-4483 be addressed? I don't think Maven can keep the
.m2 user directory exclusively -- it could be a good fallback for
compatibility -- but it should be looking for .m3 or .
17 matches
Mail list logo
