Re: MNG-4056, please comment

2009-03-03 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: Yeah, it sounds right. OK, so there seem to be no objections to the patch. As such, I will try to apply it to 2.1.x and 3.x this day or tomorrow. Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mave

Re: MNG-4056, please comment

2009-03-02 Thread Brett Porter
n the first place. Sources is the other one that comes to mind... if true you should handle that the same. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:11 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: MNG-4056, please comment Hi, I rec

Re: MNG-4056, please comment

2009-03-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brian E. Fox wrote: Seems logical to me. I don't know why there are these special mappings in the first place. Not sure either, possibly to control the addedToClasspath flag of the artifact handler [0] (which is false for java-source but true for javadoc...). Sources is the other one tha

RE: MNG-4056, please comment

2009-03-01 Thread Brian E. Fox
009 9:11 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: MNG-4056, please comment Hi, I recently created a patch for MNG-4056 and would appreciate some comments whether that's the proper way to address the issue. In short, this issue is about the subtle difference between gid ai

MNG-4056, please comment

2009-03-01 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, I recently created a patch for MNG-4056 and would appreciate some comments whether that's the proper way to address the issue. In short, this issue is about the subtle difference between gid aid 0.1 tests and gid aid 0.1 test-jar i.e. test-ja