Re: MNG-2605

2009-01-16 Thread John Casey
If it's the consensus that profiles defined in profiles.xml should not be activeByDefault, I'm happy to go for it. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.

Re: MNG-2605

2009-01-10 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
profiles.xml. By now an IT is online showing that for a profiles.xml like mng-2605-profiles INJECTED the profile "mng-2605-profiles" gets activated upon mere invocation of "mvn validate", i.e. without "-Pmng-2605-p

Re: MNG-2605

2009-01-09 Thread John Casey
tings were those explicitly named in the activeProfiles section. I'd say this code is out of date, and needs revision. Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, quick question about MNG-2605: Is the current behavior a feature or a bug? The problematic code is in ProfilesConversionUtils.j

MNG-2605

2008-12-29 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, quick question about MNG-2605: Is the current behavior a feature or a bug? The problematic code is in ProfilesConversionUtils.java if ( profileActivation != null ) { [convert it] } else { profile.setActivation( new