On 2012-11-20 04:13, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
Do we have, right now, either:
1) A way of mapping java-
On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> Do we have, right now, either:
>>>
>>> 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or
>>>
>>
>>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Do we have, right now, either:
>>
>> 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or
>>
>
> Do you mean commons-logging, JUL, or both? There are ways to adapt both
On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Do we have, right now, either:
>
> 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or
>
Do you mean commons-logging, JUL, or both? There are ways to adapt both to
SLF4J.
> 2) A way of mapping slf4j to the mojo log?
>
Moj
Do we have, right now, either:
1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or
2) A way of mapping slf4j to the mojo log?
?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-