Hello there,
2013/7/16 Chris Graham
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Lennart Jörelid
> wrote:
>
> > This is not (or should not be) an entirely technical question - support
> for
> > various versions of JDK may be the simpler criterion to discuss, but I
> feel
> > the more relevant question is
FYI, in the next version of logback, i.e. 2.0, we will be using JDK 1.6.
However, the logback 1.1.x series will continue to be based on JDK 1.5.
On 16.07.2013 07:06, Stephen Connolly wrote:
So what I am hearing is that until we bump core to require JDK6 (or 7) then
logback is the only runner
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Lennart Jörelid
wrote:
> This is not (or should not be) an entirely technical question - support for
> various versions of JDK may be the simpler criterion to discuss, but I feel
> the more relevant question is
>
> "Do we first and foremost see small-scale projects
This is not (or should not be) an entirely technical question - support for
various versions of JDK may be the simpler criterion to discuss, but I feel
the more relevant question is
"Do we first and foremost see small-scale projects [small organisations] or
enterprise-scale projects [enterprise-sc
I would prefer going from JDK5 to 7 immediately as well, old JDK means
usage of old tools.
Regards Mirko
--
Sent from my mobile
On Jul 16, 2013 7:07 AM, "Stephen Connolly"
wrote:
> So what I am hearing is that until we bump core to require JDK6 (or 7) then
> logback is the only runner from a te
So what I am hearing is that until we bump core to require JDK6 (or 7) then
logback is the only runner from a technical point of view (never mind that
log4j2 is still not GA)
OTOH I would be interested in bumping JDK all the way to 7 if we were happy
that toolchains is good enough and we had tests
Hi
FYI I rebased both branches on current master :
*
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/slf4j-log4j2
*
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/slf4j-logback
With all work done by Herve both branches have only one intere
