t;>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>&
apache.logging.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I asked Ceki for help I’d get it immediately also. Who
> &
;>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice they are doing it doesn't avoid you to use another
>>> one
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> own
>&
>>>>>>>> examination, issue submissions, pull requests and ultimately
>> > more
>> > >>>>> people
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> that contribute and that’s clearly the case with Logback. I
>> > don’t
>&g
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 3:21 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The sometimes heated discussion in this thread shows that there are strong
> opinions about logging implementation. That for me is a reason to not
> bundle one by default.
>
> Let us focus on making it as simple as possible for o
You’re welcome. I do try to bring a chuckle to everyone’s day.
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
> >> No, I don’t that useful. If it’s an extensions then it can be activated
> >> using the .mvn/extensions.xml and downloa
Hi,
The sometimes heated discussion in this thread shows that there are strong
opinions about logging implementation. That for me is a reason to not
bundle one by default.
Let us focus on making it as simple as possible for our end users to
configure which one they want to use.
I'm not familiar
On traction we can agree to disagree. Logback may be more popular but we are
pretty busy answering user's questions, and making enhancements and fixes. I
follow the Logback lists and actually see less activity there. And I continue
to see users ask frameworks to support Log4j 2. Frankly, I was s
Ralph,
The simple fact of the matter is that Log4J2 appears to have little to no user
traction at all. This suggests to me that the community forked into the next
generation by way of Logback and Log4J2. The community appears to have gone in
the direction of Logback. By a very large margin, at
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> No, I don’t that useful. If it’s an extensions then it can be activated
>> using the .mvn/extensions.xml and downloaded on demand. I think for Maven
>> 4.x we just bite the bullet an
t;>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Jason van Zyl <
> > ja...@takari.io>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
t;> ==>62389
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> gremlin> g.V('vc',
> >>>>> 'org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core').inE.count()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ==>31
py Holidays.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Can the next version of Maven be rid of this warning:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [WARN] The SLF4J binding actually used is n
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Arnaud Héritier
> wrote:
> >
> > No problem.
> > Let's do what you want (like always).
>
> Not that I want it, but that’s certainly never been the case. The project
> would most definitely look different if i
I apologize for this email. It was not meant for this list.
Ralph
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> He claims that Log4j 2 isn’t popular enough. The real reason, as you
> probably know, is that Jason seriously dislikes me, although he would never
> actually say that as hi
He claims that Log4j 2 isn’t popular enough. The real reason, as you probably
know, is that Jason seriously dislikes me, although he would never actually say
that as his reason.
Ralph
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Arnaud Héritier wr
>>> ==>62389
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> gremlin> g.V('vc',
> >>>>> 'org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core').inE.count()
> >>>>>>>>>>
; wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As we said previously when the the question arose again there
>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion. You may not remember, b
but I expect there to be a
> > >>>>>>> discussion.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have built a graph of Maven Central to analyze the rank
> > (count
> > >>> of
> > >>>>>
t;>>>>>>>> and not the owner project in pretty much the exact same way
> users
> >>> went
> >>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins and not Hudson. Anyone is happy to take the graph and
> >>> veri
at 5:46 PM, Jason van Zyl <
>> > > ja...@takari.io>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > >>>>>>>
>> > > >> > >>>>>>>> These are the n
; 'org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core').inE.count()
> > > >> > >>>>>>>> ==>3134
> > > >> > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>>>>> These are incoming edges across all versions of said
> >
t; >>>> discussion.
> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>>> I have built a graph of Maven Central to analyze the rank
> > >> (count
> > >> > of
> > >> > >>>> all
> > >&g
;>> project
> >> > >>>>>>>> and not the owner project in pretty much the exact same way
> >> users
> >> > went
> >> > >>>>>> with
> >> > >>>>>>>> Jenkins and not Hudson. An
ed on Logback that I would really like to use, and
>> the
>> > color
>> > >>>>>>>> logging is also easy with Logback. I do not want to use
>> something
>> > that
>> > >>>>>> the
>> > >&
> >>>>>>>> community at large has not adopted.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Again, anyone is welcome to the code and/or the data if they
> > > want to
> > > >>>>&
t;>>>>> much
> > >>>>>>>> here in these discussions but I’m vehemently opposed to
> > integrating
> > >>>>>> Log4J2.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7
;>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:55 AM, Arnaud Héritier <
> > aherit...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> thanks for this valuable comment Jason :(
> > &g
t;>>>> Do not merge this branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 4:05 AM, Tibor Digana <
> tibordig...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
t;>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just because only 2.4 was available when I updated this feature
>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>> months ag
t;>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the update.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not update the Log4j 2 dep from 2.4 to 2.
> > > > > >>>>> - ch.qos.logback.classic.LoggerContext
> > > > > >>>>> - org.slf4j.helpers.Log4jLoggerFactory
> > > > > >>>>> - org.slf4j.impl.SimpleLoggerFactory
> > > > > >>>>>
> &g
4jLoggerFactory
> > > > >>>>> - org.slf4j.impl.SimpleLoggerFactory
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Is there a step I am missing to use Log4j 2 cleanly? My steps
> are
> > > > >> here:
> > > &
gt;>>>> E-Mail: [hidden email]
> > > >> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=3>
> >
> > > | [hidden
> > > >> email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=4>
>
t; | [hidden
> > >> email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=4>
> > >>>
> > >>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > >>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > >>>>> JUnit in Action,
ser/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=0>> a
>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arnaud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>&g
6 at 2:46 PM, Arnaud Héritier <[hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=1>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>&g
;>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> maven-embedder/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/slf4j-configuration.properties
> >>>&g
update I did after my old blog post :
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.aheritier.net/united-colors-of-maven/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
t;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Happy Holidays.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
g.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory
>>>>>>>>>> [WARN] Maven supported bindings are:
>>>>>>>>>> [WARN] (from
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
rdpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
--
-----
Arnaud Héritier
http://aheritier.net
Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
Twitter/Skype : aheritier
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
discussio
p://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
--
-
Arnaud Héritier
http://aheritier.net
Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
Twitter/Skype : aheritier
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be a
ar!/META-INF/maven/slf4j-configuration.properties)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - ch.qos.logback.classic.LoggerContext
> >>>>>>>> - org.slf4j.helpers.Log4jLoggerFactory
> >>>>>>>> - org.slf4j.impl.SimpleLogg
gt;>>>>>> Is there a step I am missing to use Log4j 2 cleanly? My steps are
>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>> https://garygregory.wordpress.com/2015/03/23/watch-maven-in-color/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> E-Mail
mail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=4>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.mann
gt;> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=3>
>
> > | [hidden
> > >> email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=4>
> > >>>
> > >>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edi
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >>>
nning.com/templier/>
>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -
>>>> Arnaud
witter.com/GaryGregory
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -
> > > > Arnaud Héritier
> > > > http://aheritier.net
> > > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
>
er.net
> > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5857870&i=5> |
> [hidden
> email] <htt
Just because only 2.4 was available when I updated this feature branch few
months ago.
Le mardi 5 janvier 2016, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> Thank you for the update.
>
> Why not update the Log4j 2 dep from 2.4 to 2.5?
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Arnaud Héritier > wr
Hi Arnaud,
Thank you for the update.
Why not update the Log4j 2 dep from 2.4 to 2.5?
Gary
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> I fixed this in the branch :
> https://github.com/apache/maven/commits/slf4j-log4j2.4
> The fix is in
>
> maven-embedder/src/main
Hi Gary,
I fixed this in the branch :
https://github.com/apache/maven/commits/slf4j-log4j2.4
The fix is in
maven-embedder/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/slf4j-configuration.properties
(
https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/8cddea291c279130d437bcdf3337f16296558530
)
It is the update I di
Am 2015-12-25 um 16:09 schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Happy Holidays.
Can the next version of Maven be rid of this warning:
[WARN] The SLF4J binding actually used is not supported by Maven:
org.apache.logging.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory
[WARN] Maven supported bindings are:
[WARN] (from
jar:file:/E
Hi All,
Happy Holidays.
Can the next version of Maven be rid of this warning:
[WARN] The SLF4J binding actually used is not supported by Maven:
org.apache.logging.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory
[WARN] Maven supported bindings are:
[WARN] (from
jar:file:/E:/Java/apache-maven-3.3.9/bin/../lib/maven-embe
57 matches
Mail list logo
