Hi Chris,
You scared me a bit, as if something went wrong during the release.
I've never released 2.4 [1], but I did deploy a 2.4-SNAPSHOT.
Since this is a bugfix-release, I've changed the version to 2.3.2 during
release.
I'll keep developing for 2.4-SNAPSHOT, because that's still my target for
Hi Robert.
Thanks for that.
Now, you've called for a vote on 2.3.2, but when I checked out the
release dir, it was 2.4! That was before the voet was called for, and I
mentioned it above, but you might have missed it.
Has the version been incorrctly bumped up?
In short, what are we votin
Up until SCM-1.7 the ScmFile had no specification about its arguments.
It just depended on the provider.
But for good usability the ScmFile should be transparent for the *users*,
not the provider.
Fixing this with the ScmFile can be dangerous and would take a lot of time.
So the fastest way to
[INFO] Cleaning up after release...
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 7 minutes 8 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Jun 11 14:27:46
Oops. Bad bad me.
[INFO]
[INFO] Building GPDB - J2EE Multi Module Project
[INFO]task-segment: [release:prepare, release:perform]
(aggregator-style)
[INFO]
--
Hi Robert,
We're up to 2.4-SNAPSHOT now?
Nope. Still not being called.
Let me look into it for ya. :-)
-Chris
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Chris Graham wrote:
> Ok. I'll check it tomorrow.
>
> I'm in Sydney in a hotel room with a WiFi that doesn't.
>
> -Chris
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
Ok. I'll check it tomorrow.
I'm in Sydney in a hotel room with a WiFi that doesn't.
-Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 10/06/2012, at 7:34 PM, "Robert Scholte" wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> By coincident Sonar pointed me to this issue.
> I've created MRELEASE-770 and fixed it.
> A SNAPSHOT has been depl
Hi Chris,
By coincident Sonar pointed me to this issue.
I've created MRELEASE-770 and fixed it.
A SNAPSHOT has been deployed, ready for testing.
-Robert
Op Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:29:15 +0200 schreef Chris Graham
:
Hi Robert.
I was just running it from two different locations (workspaces),
Hi Robert.
I was just running it from two different locations (workspaces), otherwise
no real differences. Both are valid workspaces.
-Chris
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> yes, I would expect it between "Verifying that there are no local
> modifications..
Hi Chris,
yes, I would expect it between "Verifying that there are no local
modifications..." and "Checking dependencies and plugins for snapshots
...", unless there's no reason to call it.
This latest log doesn't match your first log, which failed right after the
"Working directory..." - i
Hi Robert.
Found a few minutes...
As far as I can see, the method toRelativePath is not being called.
When are you expecting it to be called? I would have thought at the check
for local modifications.
But, this is what I'm seeing:
[INFO]
Hi Chris,
I'd like to do a 2.3.2 release somewhere next week.
Could you investigate this issue?
-Robert
Op Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:24:01 +0200 schreef Chris Graham
:
Now that I have my VM (where I've done all of my jazz development) back
able to talk to the Internet, I'll give it a go.
-Chr
Now that I have my VM (where I've done all of my jazz development) back able to
talk to the Internet, I'll give it a go.
-Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 02/06/2012, at 6:17 PM, "Robert Scholte" wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> can you confirm that the
> org.apache.maven.shared.release.scm.JazzScmTransl
Hi Chris,
can you confirm that the
org.apache.maven.shared.release.scm.JazzScmTranslator.toRelativePath(String)
is executed?
I've written unittests for this method, which reflect your usecase. Have a
look at them too.
-Robert
Op Sat, 02 Jun 2012 05:46:14 +0200 schreef Chris Graham
:
Hi All.
Sorry for that the fact that it's taken me so long to get around to testing
the 2.3.1 release plugin, but my laptop had some 'firewall issues' that
needed to be resolved by IBM.
So, I checked out a new jazz workspace, and attempted my first release in
it, and this is what I got:
C:\tmp\r
15 matches
Mail list logo
