e-
> > De : bob mcwhirter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : mardi 20 juillet 2004 20:28
> > À : Maven Developers List
> > Objet : RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > > What
+1 from me
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 20 juillet 2004 20:42
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> I think (if others are agree) that it could be a good
--
> > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 5:51 PM
> > > To: Maven Developers List
> > > Subject: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm not sur
It should be changed for maven-plugins or it will be a nightmare with so
many plugins.
> -Original Message-
> From: bob mcwhirter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:28 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versi
n Developers List
> Objet : RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
> > What JIRA role is needed to add versions to plugins?
>
> Well, whatever role is specified by the project.
>
> I think Maven requires jira-adm
You must be administrator :-(
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Carlos Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 20 juillet 2004 20:24
> À : 'Maven Developers List'
> Objet : RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> What JIRA role
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> What JIRA role is needed to add versions to plugins?
Well, whatever role is specified by the project.
I think Maven requires jira-administrator, but that can certainly
be changed.
It could become maven-developers, or we could create yet-another
group
What JIRA role is needed to add versions to plugins?
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:15 PM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> +1 fo
0 juillet 2004 17:51
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what the standard practice is for queuing up issues to be
> resolved for a version but I think what we have going on is not quite
> optimal.
>
> When
ation of the issues. I'll do a little spring cleaning while I
move the issues.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 5:51 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: JIRA issues perta
elopers List
> Subject: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what the standard practice is for queuing up
> issues to be resolved for a version but I think what we have
> going on is not quite optimal.
>
> When planning a release I would like to
+1. I'd like it if the notification was turned off while this is suffeled
around, I don't want 100 jira mails popping up at the same time, too much
clutter.
--
Trygve
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:50:59AM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what the standard practice is for queuing
Sounds good to me.
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 20 juillet 2004 17:51
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what the standard prac
Hi,
I'm not sure what the standard practice is for queuing up issues to be
resolved for a version but I think what we have going on is not quite
optimal.
When planning a release I would like to pick the issues that can be
tackled for a release and roadmapped. We have 120 issues outstanding for
1.
14 matches
Mail list logo