>>
> >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:29 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > While working through the bugs I found this interesting bit of history:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluenc
ections,
>> rather than simply ignoring the issue and not responding.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:29 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > While working through the bugs I found this interesting bit of history:
>> >
>> >
>>
ers to be politely honest with them about our true objections,
> rather than simply ignoring the issue and not responding.
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:29 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
> wrote:
> >
> > While working through the bugs I found this interesting bit of history:
> >
h the bugs I found this interesting bit of history:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/The+Great+JIRA+Cleanup+of+2014
> >
> > It seems like we've been here before. Some of the bugs that were
> > autoclosed then were reopened and are now scheduled for a
0, 2019 at 6:29 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
>
> While working through the bugs I found this interesting bit of history:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/The+Great+JIRA+Cleanup+of+2014
>
> It seems like we've been here before. Some of the bugs that we
I will exlude those. It does not makes sense to close/reopen again.
Am 2019-12-20 um 12:29 schrieb Elliotte Rusty Harold:
While working through the bugs I found this interesting bit of history:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/The+Great+JIRA+Cleanup+of+2014
It seems like
While working through the bugs I found this interesting bit of history:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/The+Great+JIRA+Cleanup+of+2014
It seems like we've been here before. Some of the bugs that were
autoclosed then were reopened and are now scheduled for autoclose
again
Am 2019-12-13 um 16:08 schrieb Elliotte Rusty Harold:
NVM, I seem to have access now. I think I just needed to logout with
my old credentials and back in with the new ones.
Elliotte,
please go through the list and update those tickets you seen to be
addressible within a decent timeframe.
Mi
NVM, I seem to have access now. I think I just needed to logout with
my old credentials and back in with the new ones.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 9:56 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:56 PM Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > I think we have some crazy permissions that Brian
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:56 PM Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> I think we have some crazy permissions that Brian manages. Ldap just fixes
> the account name to match across systems AIUI
>
That's probably true. As of an hour ago, I did not seem able to close issues.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elh...@i
On Thu 12 Dec 2019 at 17:31, Robert Scholte wrote:
> IIUC since Jira uses the ASF LDAP, there's no extra need for Brian to do
> this anymore. All should be in place by now.
>
I think we have some crazy permissions that Brian manages. Ldap just fixes
the account name to match across systems AIUI
IIUC since Jira uses the ASF LDAP, there's no extra need for Brian to do this
anymore. All should be in place by now.
thanks,
Robert
On 12-12-2019 15:20:24, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
On Mon 9 Dec 2019 at 20:53, Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:18 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
>
On Mon 9 Dec 2019 at 20:53, Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:18 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> >
> > Am 2019-12-08 um 18:08 schrieb Elliotte Rusty Harold:
> > > Please don't. There are certainly some real and important issues in
> > > there. More importantly, users spent a gre
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:18 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> Am 2019-12-08 um 18:08 schrieb Elliotte Rusty Harold:
> > Please don't. There are certainly some real and important issues in
> > there. More importantly, users spent a great deal of effort and time
> > to file those. Bulk closing them tells
Take your time, you have at least three weeks.
Am 2019-12-08 um 18:23 schrieb Tibor Digana:
Hi Michael,
What's up :-)
Thx for making the list of issues.
Pls give me one day to see it completely. I will get back to you tomorrow.
Cheers
Tibor17
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 6:08 PM Elliotte Rusty Haro
Am 2019-12-08 um 18:08 schrieb Elliotte Rusty Harold:
Please don't. There are certainly some real and important issues in
there. More importantly, users spent a great deal of effort and time
to file those. Bulk closing them tells those users we don't value
their feedback or effort. It is useful t
Hi Michael,
What's up :-)
Thx for making the list of issues.
Pls give me one day to see it completely. I will get back to you tomorrow.
Cheers
Tibor17
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 6:08 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> Please don't. There are certainly some real and important issues in
> there. More
Please don't. There are certainly some real and important issues in
there. More importantly, users spent a great deal of effort and time
to file those. Bulk closing them tells those users we don't value
their feedback or effort. It is useful to triage these issues and
consider them individually. Do
Am 2019-12-08 um 13:55 schrieb Maarten Mulders:
Hi Michael,
Great initiative. After logging in to JIRA, accessing your link shows
"The requested filter doesn't exist or is private."
This means I'm not able to verify whether there are issues in that list
that are valid for me.
Is there another
Hi Michael,
Great initiative. After logging in to JIRA, accessing your link shows
"The requested filter doesn't exist or is private."
This means I'm not able to verify whether there are issues in that list
that are valid for me.
Is there another way to find those issues?
Cheers,
Maarten
On
Hi folks,
after at least one year of silence, I'd like to perform another JIRA
issue cleanup for issues which have been not touched for more than three
years.
Query:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12333204&jql=category%20%3D%20Maven%20AND%20updated%20%3C%3D%20-153w%20AND%20res
Am 2015-09-07 um 10:40 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Am 2015-08-30 um 21:31 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Hi folks,
some of you might remember that I have closed a bunch of issues some
time ago. I'd like to reperform that task because we have more than 3100
open issues at the moment [1].
Many issues (thou
Am 2015-08-30 um 21:31 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Hi folks,
some of you might remember that I have closed a bunch of issues some
time ago. I'd like to reperform that task because we have more than 3100
open issues at the moment [1].
Many issues (thousands) haven't been touched for years. I hardly
just remove the filter param and it will work
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=category%20%3D%20Maven%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 2 septembre 2015 10:31:43 Tibor Digana a écrit :
> The link is not reachable. Can you fi
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 02. September 2015 um 10:31 Uhr
> Von: "Tibor Digana"
> An: "Maven Developers List"
> Betreff: Re: Another JIRA cleanup
>
> The link is not reachable. Can you fix it?
> The requested filter doesn't exist or is private.
The link is not reachable. Can you fix it?
The requested filter doesn't exist or is private.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> some of you might remember that I have closed a bunch of issues some time
> ago. I'd like to reperform that task because we have mor
ok for me: I didn't like it the first time, but with experience, this cause
less trouble than manual dust cleaning in Jira issues
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 30 août 2015 21:31:43 Michael Osipov a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> some of you might remember that I have closed a bunch of issues some
> tim
+1
I think the constant looking at ways to cleanup the issues is necessary. So I
appreciate going through and culling the issues that have not been looked at in
quite a while.
> On Aug 30, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> some of you might remember that I have closed
Hi folks,
some of you might remember that I have closed a bunch of issues some
time ago. I'd like to reperform that task because we have more than 3100
open issues at the moment [1].
Many issues (thousands) haven't been touched for years. I hardly believe
that someone will pick them up after
gt;> took all the issues that have not been updated in the last year and
>> unassigned and closed those out. Got to about the same number and thought
>> this more fair.
>>
>> I referred anyone looking at the comment to
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp
nuar 2014 03:33
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: JIRA Cleanup
I changed the strategy slightly as I thought it might be crappy if the issue
was created 5 years ago, but the person updated it 2 months ago. So I took all
the issues that have not been updated in the last year and unassigned and
close
referred anyone looking at the comment to
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/The+Great+JIRA+Cleanup+of+2014
>
> I'll start sifting through what remains tomorrow.
>
> On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > Yup, it's very straight for
more fair.
I referred anyone looking at the comment to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/The+Great+JIRA+Cleanup+of+2014
I'll start sifting through what remains tomorrow.
On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Yup, it's very straight forward to add a co
14, at 4:53 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I'll write something up and send it to the user and dev list.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 20, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Benson Margulies
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 here.
st.
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 20, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 here.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Anders Hammar
>> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 on clean up if
> >>>> 0 on move
> >>>>
> >>>> /Anders
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Dominik Bartholdi
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 cleanup is a really good idea!
> >>
explain why).
>>>> 0 on move
>>>>
>>>> /Anders
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Dominik Bartholdi
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 cleanup is a really good idea!
>>>
gt; +1 on clean up if we communicate this (and explain why).
>>> 0 on move
>>>
>>> /Anders
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Dominik Bartholdi wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 cleanup is a really good idea!
&
t;
>> /Anders
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Dominik Bartholdi wrote:
>>
>>> +1 cleanup is a really good idea!
>>>
>>> On 20.01.2014, at 18:50, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 with a jira cleanup
; On 20.01.2014, at 18:50, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>>
>> > +1 with a jira cleanup (but documented and announced to users to let them
>> > understand what we do and why)
>> > +1 to move to ASF
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On M
+1 on clean up if we communicate this (and explain why).
0 on move
/Anders
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Dominik Bartholdi wrote:
> +1 cleanup is a really good idea!
>
> On 20.01.2014, at 18:50, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
> > +1 with a jira cleanup (but documented and ann
+1 cleanup is a really good idea!
On 20.01.2014, at 18:50, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> +1 with a jira cleanup (but documented and announced to users to let them
> understand what we do and why)
> +1 to move to ASF
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Jason van Zyl
+1 with a jira cleanup (but documented and announced to users to let them
understand what we do and why)
+1 to move to ASF
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Works for me to just start over on the ASF JIRA. There are a couple issues
> I'd move but we can migra
Works for me to just start over on the ASF JIRA. There are a couple issues I'd
move but we can migrate a issues easily. What can't continue is the complete,
incomprehensible mess that is there now.
On Jan 20, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> If we are going wholesale dumping issue
On Jan 20, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> If we are going wholesale dumping issues (and I am not against that), I
> have a more radical suggestion... let's just move core to the ASF JIRA...
> with next to no issues needing migration it would be easy ;-)
+1
Good idea.
Dan
Am 2014-01-20 18:32, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
If we are going wholesale dumping issues (and I am not against that), I
have a more radical suggestion... let's just move core to the ASF JIRA...
with next to no issues needing migration it would be easy ;-)
+1
I head this idea in mind for several
Am 2014-01-20 18:32, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
If we are going wholesale dumping issues (and I am not against that), I
have a more radical suggestion... let's just move core to the ASF JIRA...
with next to no issues needing migration it would be easy ;-)
+1
I head this idea in mind for several
If we are going wholesale dumping issues (and I am not against that), I
have a more radical suggestion... let's just move core to the ASF JIRA...
with next to no issues needing migration it would be easy ;-)
On 20 January 2014 17:23, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Really, it's more about dropping a nuc
Really, it's more about dropping a nuclear bomb on JIRA. While trying to sift
through it this weekend it's clear to me it's less than ideal in there.
There are issues that are 12 years old and while there might be some useful
information in there that we hand select, I think anything that is old
On 12/19/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hen:
MRM-207 Major POM error when indexing an m1 repositoryHenri
Yandell
MRM-208 Major Javadoc error while indexing m1 repository Henri
Yandell
Not sure when I'll retest them; but as it's based on test data o
Hi,
There are now no plugin components in the Maven core JIRA project. I
removed the Torque component this morning and moved all the remaining
xdoc issues to the xdoc plugin.
I am going to move out the jar upload requests into a separate project
so that ASAP all that will remain will be core issu
Howdy,
For almost all JIRA components in the main Maven project that were for
components have been removed and a new JIRA project for that specific
plugin has been created.
I took the liberty of deleting some dupes, or issues that have been
fixed that were so trivial that I saw no problem removin
52 matches
Mail list logo
