RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread Brett Porter
I meant the error "xdoc plugin not found". > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 3:41 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL

RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread dion
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/03/2004 03:01:33 PM: > Yep, I saw the report. > > The first error I swear I fixed. I will check. Cool. > As for the other errors - this is just the way bootstrap works. If a plugin > build fails, no more plugins build but the bootstrap continues. Thi

RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread Brett Porter
users. - Brett > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 2:32 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/03/2004 > 01:2

RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread dion
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/03/2004 01:21:40 PM: > That's already been fixed. Are you using a clean co of maven-plugins HEAD > and a recent update of maven HEAD or MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH? I'm using maven-plugins HEAD and maven MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting

RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread Brett Porter
rs List > Subject: RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap > > > I'll start a bootstrap and post a JIRA entry, but anything lots of > breakages. > The first is in the J2EE plugin test cases, it then moves on > to another. > Even running some stuff under 1.3 breaks for me. >

RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread Brett Porter
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH worked for me about a week ago. I can take a look later... - Brett > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 11:53 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap >

RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread dion
30/03/2004 09:27:40 AM: > All problems should have been fixed. Where does it break? > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, 29 March 2004 2:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: JDK 1.3 and

RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread dion
D] > > Sent: Monday, 29 March 2004 2:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap > > > > > > I can't bootstrap with jdk1.3 as JAVA_HOME. > > Is this expected? > > -- > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > >

RE: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-29 Thread Brett Porter
All problems should have been fixed. Where does it break? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 29 March 2004 2:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: JDK 1.3 and bootstrap > > > I can't bootstrap with j

JDK 1.3 and bootstrap

2004-03-28 Thread dion
I can't bootstrap with jdk1.3 as JAVA_HOME. Is this expected? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting