On 7-Jul-08, at 10:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 08/07/2008, at 11:59 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
You mean bootstrap first, then use that build to run
release:prepare...?
I would expect release:prepare to be run normally, but the bootstrap
to be used in release:perform if this is the case.
It would have been the last good build from the bootstrap so
effectively that, yes.
On 7-Jul-08, at 9:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
You mean bootstrap first, then use that build to run
release:prepare...?
--Brian
On Jul 7, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm w
On 08/07/2008, at 11:59 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
You mean bootstrap first, then use that build to run
release:prepare...?
I would expect release:prepare to be run normally, but the bootstrap
to be used in release:perform if this is the case.
I'm working release planning, and I want to define
You mean bootstrap first, then use that build to run release:prepare...?
--Brian
On Jul 7, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm working release planning, and I want to define how we actually
build Maven for a release.
For me it essentially boils down to:
Us
Hi,
I'm working release planning, and I want to define how we actually
build Maven for a release.
For me it essentially boils down to:
Use the last bootstrap version of the build to produce the version of
Maven for the given release.
I think this lets us remain internally self-consistent
