On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 13:58, Steve Garcia wrote:
> > > Now, if project B's pom is stored in the local repo with no
> > properties
> > > resolved (i.e. the pom file is not the interpolated
> > version) then project
> > > A needs to have definitions for these properties. This would not be
> > > p
> > Now, if project B's pom is stored in the local repo with no
> properties
> > resolved (i.e. the pom file is not the interpolated
> version) then project
> > A needs to have definitions for these properties. This would not be
> > possible unless the properties files are also made
> availabl
>
>
>
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 05/01/2004 03:23 PM
> Please respond to "Maven Developers List"
>
>
> To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject:Re: Installed POMS not inte
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael A Melia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:39 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
>
>
> Hi Jason,
> I checked on irc a few times but was unable to catch up
To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > would still like
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
formally limit i
t"
To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > wo
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
> > dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
> > formally limit if possibl
> I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
> dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
> formally limit if possible.
Yes, I am using properties for version numbers. e.g. ${r
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 02:37, Michael A Melia wrote:
> To clarify my assumptions:
>
> [usual transitive dependency scenario]
>
> I have project A dependent on project B which is dependent on project C
> and project D.
> I need for project A to pick up the dependencies (C and D) from project B.
>> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo
are
>> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having
been
>> interpolated already.
> That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for
> in the new maven code is to keep the
> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo
are
> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having
been
> interpolated already.
That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for
in the new maven code is to keep the model
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 21:54, Michael A Melia wrote:
> I'm looking at providing the capability for transitive dependencies in
> Maven which would (in my eyes) rely on the pom files being installed in
> the poms directory in the local repository.
> I've noticed that only ejb, ear and war projects i
I'm looking at providing the capability for transitive dependencies in
Maven which would (in my eyes) rely on the pom files being installed in
the poms directory in the local repository.
I've noticed that only ejb, ear and war projects install the poms to the
local repository. Is there a reason
14 matches
Mail list logo
