2008/7/28 Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You're right that provided is not transitive, although this example
> relates to scope resolution which occurs when an artifacts has two
> different scopes. See:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Dependency+Mediation+and+Conflict+Resolution#Dep
2008/7/28 Stephen Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> AFAIK, provided is not transitive, so a provided dependency is assumed to be
> provided by any consumer of b
You're right that provided is not transitive, although this example
relates to scope resolution which occurs when an artifacts has two
diff
AFAIK, provided is not transitive, so a provided dependency is assumed to be
provided by any consumer of b
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ping.. can anyone share some insight on this please?
>
> Mark
>
> 2008/7/22 Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi
Ping.. can anyone share some insight on this please?
Mark
2008/7/22 Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi there,
>
> I've encountered an issue with the scope resolution for nearest test
> and farthest provided scenario. Consider the following projects:
>
>a -> commons-lang
>b -> commons-
Hi there,
I've encountered an issue with the scope resolution for nearest test
and farthest provided scenario. Consider the following projects:
a -> commons-lang
b -> commons-lang
c -> a:test, b:provided
Where -> denotes a dependency and group ids, types and versions have
been omitt
