Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I think this is a great idea. You could even put the new apache wide
repository and staging area in the release profile. Would make doing a
release a snap IMO.
That part is already in Apache-5 ;-)
---
I think this is a great idea. You could even put the new apache wide
repository and staging area in the release profile. Would make doing a
release a snap IMO.
Martijn
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> We currently have some expectations about what artifacts are created for
> a
I think it is a fine idea and would serve as a good example of best
practices for other organizations to follow...
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 14:18, Brian Fox wrote:
> We currently have some expectations about what artifacts are created for
> ap
We currently have some expectations about what artifacts are created for
apache builds, such as javadocs and source jars, and specifically
artifact signatures. Currently each project must configure the current
release profile in their own top level pom. This raises the bar of entry
for new proj
