Hi!
It was great seeing that others have the same problem with complex
objects for Maven configuration and the generated documentation.
For the android maven plugin
http://code.google.com/p/maven-android-plugin/
I have derived a bit of a standard on how we deal with this and we have
implement
+2048 ;-)
Regards Mirko
--
Sent from my phone
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com
http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Dec 12, 2011 3:49 AM, "Jesse Farinacci" wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > This is something tha
I think this was leveraging plexus' implementation, so probably now in sisu.
There's no reason that still needs to be the case, if you want to expand it but
retain backwards compatibility you should be able to. The place to look is
getConfiguredMojo and populatePluginFields in
maven-core/src/ma
Yep, completely agree!
On 12/12/2011, at 1:47 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> This is something that frustrates users no end: when a plugin has a
> parameter of complex type, and the doc does not elucidate the
> structure of the complex doc At All.
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Brett Porter
Reading this doc some more, I'm really sad to read that the 'complex
type' mechanism doesn't just use the type of the parameter
declaration, but rather insists on mapping the element name to a type.
I don't suppose there's any chance that this doc is old news? Where
does this code live, anyhow?
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> This is something that frustrates users no end: when a plugin has a
> parameter of complex type, and the doc does not elucidate the
> structure of the complex doc At All.
+1024
-Jesse
--
There are 10 types of people in this world, thos
This is something that frustrates users no end: when a plugin has a
parameter of complex type, and the doc does not elucidate the
structure of the complex doc At All.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 12/12/2011, at 9:12 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Looking at
>> ht
On 12/12/2011, at 9:12 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Looking at
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-configuring-plugins.html#Mapping_Complex_Objects,
> I'm wondering how to get the generated doc to travel down into the
> bean object. This isn't a job for modello, is it?
Not really - mo
Looking at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-configuring-plugins.html#Mapping_Complex_Objects,
I'm wondering how to get the generated doc to travel down into the
bean object. This isn't a job for modello, is it?
-
To uns
