Yes sorry
I didn't think to the email notification !!! :-(
Arnaud
On 8/22/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:41:40PM +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> > Yes I think it's not a good practice to assign by default the issue to
> > someone.
> > Th
I agree. I was just rushing off to check there weren't any more default
assignee's after the jira flood :)
I was thinking today that changing that query qould be a good idea - or
perhaps just show the assignee on the page?
- Brett
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>Yes I think it's not a good practice to
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:41:40PM +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Yes I think it's not a good practice to assign by default the issue to
> someone.
> The person shhould assign it to himself when he wants to work on it.
> I just removed the default assignement for my plugin in m1 ;-)
Yah, noticed
Yes I think it's not a good practice to assign by default the issue to
someone.
The person shhould assign it to himself when he wants to work on it.
I just removed the default assignement for my plugin in m1 ;-)
Arnaud
On 8/22/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Be careful with this rule
> A lot of plugins (in m1) are auto-assigned to the plugin's manager.
> I must deactivate this rules for my plugins but I always forgot to do it
> Actually I have more than one hundred of issues assigned to
Be careful with this rule
A lot of plugins (in m1) are auto-assigned to the plugin's manager.
I must deactivate this rules for my plugins but I always forgot to do it
Actually I have more than one hundred of issues assigned to me.
I know that Jason had also a lot of issues.
Arnaud
On 8/22/05, Tr
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:15:59PM +0200, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
> One remark though. I think the Jira's filters should be updated to
> take only "Unassigned" issues. If the issue is currently assigned, we
> could assume someone is taking care of it, right?
>
> WDYT?
Hm, that's a good point. Unle
One remark though. I think the Jira's filters should be updated to
take only "Unassigned" issues. If the issue is currently assigned, we
could assume someone is taking care of it, right?
WDYT?
Cheers,
Stéphane
On 8/17/05, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've seen the page yesterday
I've seen the page yesterday and I must say it's an excellent idea!
Cheers,
Stéphane
On 8/16/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've added a field to our JIRA instance called "Complexity". This field is
> an indicator on how hard the issue will be, for the actual definition
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 22:22 +0200, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've added a field to our JIRA instance called "Complexity". This field is
> an indicator on how hard the issue will be, for the actual definition,
> please read[1]. There's a wiki page at our Codehaus Confluence that reads
> from
Hi!
I've added a field to our JIRA instance called "Complexity". This field is
an indicator on how hard the issue will be, for the actual definition,
please read[1]. There's a wiki page at our Codehaus Confluence that reads
from JIRA and shows an updated list[2].
The intention is to make it easie
11 matches
Mail list logo
