Sweet.
On 2009-12-30, at 11:21 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> I'm done reviewing 2.2.2 - all those issues can stay there. I'll work through
> 2.3.x, 2.2.x and 2.x as time permits (and I'm reviewing any you bump to 3.x
> that might be addressable there, though I don't expect any - keeping it to a
>
I'm done reviewing 2.2.2 - all those issues can stay there. I'll work through
2.3.x, 2.2.x and 2.x as time permits (and I'm reviewing any you bump to 3.x
that might be addressable there, though I don't expect any - keeping it to a
small number will help ship it).
On 30/12/2009, at 11:48 AM, Jas
I'm in no particular rush until the new years. I'm just slowing going through
all the issues and closing out what I can.
On 2009-12-29, at 7:41 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Sure, just will be slow going with some family matters to take care of today
> and tomorrow.
>
> On 30/12/2009, at 6:23 AM,
Sure, just will be slow going with some family matters to take care of today
and tomorrow.
On 30/12/2009, at 6:23 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Brett/John,
>
> Can you guys figure out what you would like to do for 2.x.x releases and
> flush everything else forward to 3.x? I will start scheduling
Brett/John,
Can you guys figure out what you would like to do for 2.x.x releases and flush
everything else forward to 3.x? I will start scheduling some time to start
ploughing through the validation in preparation for 3.0 alphas and betas. But
I'll take anything you guys aren't going to handle
