Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-10 Thread Sandra Parsick
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I was on vacation. it is something we prepared https://lists.apache.org/thread/07p1xyz210755qsl5gt466nyp3tdzmrs I don't know why it did not happen in this migration @Benjamin any idea? The PR linking did work because the step “importing issues” failed

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-06 Thread Benjamin Marwell
No, sorry, no idea. I will ask Sandra about it. Am Do., 6. Feb. 2025 um 08:25 Uhr schrieb Herve Boutemy : > > > > On 2025/02/05 08:16:44 Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > Searching for infos in old issues often involves switching between github > > (for commits / PRs) and JIRAs. > > If history can be rew

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-06 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 08:15, Hervé Boutemy wrote: > > Le mercredi 5 février 2025, 07:48:53 CET Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > > Le mer. 5 févr. 2025 à 07:36, Slawomir Jaranowski > > > > a écrit : > > > I'm still not convitient if we really need copy all issues from jira > > > to github - as I wrote

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-05 Thread Herve Boutemy
On 2025/02/05 08:16:44 Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Searching for infos in old issues often involves switching between github > (for commits / PRs) and JIRAs. > If history can be rewritten, it would clearly be a benefit. > An example: > * https://github.com/apache/maven-jlink-plugin/issues/499 > * h

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-05 Thread Hervé Boutemy
Le mercredi 5 février 2025, 07:48:53 CET Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Le mer. 5 févr. 2025 à 07:36, Slawomir Jaranowski > > a écrit : > > I'm still not convitient if we really need copy all issues from jira > > to github - as I wrote many times > > > > - jira will be exist with us > > - I don't b

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-05 Thread Benjamin Marwell
In json, you need an empty list or object ([] or {}). As of the duplicates: I'll send GitHub support the list of duplicates today. They were willing to help us clean up. As of why the first created issues where pending, they are still investigating that. Lessons learned: next time wait and don't

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-05 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 09:55, Benjamin Marwell wrote: > > It should have been. You're right. > I'll talk to infra about this. > We also disabled jira comments to the ML for migration. > maybe we can put an empty value in notification ... notifications: ... issues: ... https://github.com/apache

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-05 Thread Benjamin Marwell
It should have been. You're right. I'll talk to infra about this. We also disabled jira comments to the ML for migration. On Wed, 5 Feb 2025, 09:29 Slawomir Jaranowski, wrote: > One more issue ... we have many notifications on ML, like: > https://lists.apache.org/list?iss...@maven.apache.org:l

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-05 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
One more issue ... we have many notifications on ML, like: https://lists.apache.org/list?iss...@maven.apache.org:lte=1M:jira-importer Maybe it can be possible to disable notifications during migration time. On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 23:42, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > > If you look at https://gith

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-05 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Searching for infos in old issues often involves switching between github (for commits / PRs) and JIRAs. If history can be rewritten, it would clearly be a benefit. An example: * https://github.com/apache/maven-jlink-plugin/issues/499 * https://github.com/apache/maven-jlink-plugin/pull/229 It would

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-04 Thread Herve Boutemy
if we don't copy, we can't search in one place: I'm often searching in issues to get why we did something in the past (that years later looks strange, but history helps understand) I'd love to let some time to try before admitting we can't keep it simple in one single place once migrated Regar

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Le mer. 5 févr. 2025 à 07:36, Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > I'm still not convitient if we really need copy all issues from jira > to github - as I wrote many times > > - jira will be exist with us > - I don't believe that users before creating new issue look for old - > if yes they have a link

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-04 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
I'm still not convitient if we really need copy all issues from jira to github - as I wrote many times - jira will be exist with us - I don't believe that users before creating new issue look for old - if yes they have a link to old issues - many issues should be triaged again - it is manually wor

Re: Github issue migration problem

2025-02-04 Thread Benjamin Marwell
We are on contact with GitHub support. Please refrain from manually closing them for now. Before that, some were not displayed, were in status pending, which effectively made them missing. I'll keep you posted. On Tue, 4 Feb 2025, 23:44 Elliotte Rusty Harold, wrote: > If you look at https://

Github issue migration problem

2025-02-04 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
If you look at https://github.com/apache/maven-jlink-plugin/issues you'll notice that all the issues from the Jira have been copied into github multiple times. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elh...@ibiblio.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail