-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Shane,
>
>> Something that I think would be useful is a language/platform element. Then
>> it's purely additions to the POM. If you could identify the
>> language/platform and it's version would that be enough for you?
>
>
> For this element, I t
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> Something that I think would be useful is a language/platform element. Then
> it's purely additions to the POM. If you could identify the
> language/platform and it's version would that be enough for you?
For this element, I think it wou
On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:48 PM, "Shane Isbell"
wrote:
The idea here is not to do away with modelVersion, but rather to add
an
additional parameter, similar to modelGroupId.
Something that I think would be useful is a language/platform element.
Then it's purely additions to the POM. If y
The idea here is not to do away with modelVersion, but rather to add an
additional parameter, similar to modelGroupId.
I found a post by Bryon here talking about the extensibility:
http://freedomandbeer.com/posts/extensible-xml-with-xml-namespaces-and-relaxng
If it is possible to grab out extensi
On 11-Dec-08, at 6:48 PM, Shane Isbell wrote:
I'm encountering an issue with Byldan (.NET version of Maven) and
since this
is a general problem, I thought I'd raise it here on the list. I
need to
extend the pom model to include information like the key token id of
the
.NET assembly. Using
I'm encountering an issue with Byldan (.NET version of Maven) and since this
is a general problem, I thought I'd raise it here on the list. I need to
extend the pom model to include information like the key token id of the
.NET assembly. Using the modelVersion element of the pom isn't appropriate
t
