Hi,
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html
patterns as described on this page look okay to me.
So maybe it is not that hard to switch
Robert
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:59:26 +0200, Robert Scholte
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:02:47 +0200, Michael Osipov
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:02:47 +0200, Michael Osipov
wrote:
Am 2016-06-14 um 23:45 schrieb Robert Scholte:
too much fun to fix this.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1748472&view=rev should do the trick.
Still some doc updates required
Good! We still must take great care because throughout
Am 2016-06-14 um 23:45 schrieb Robert Scholte:
too much fun to fix this.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1748472&view=rev should do the trick.
Still some doc updates required
Good! We still must take great care because throughout several places in
Aether and Maven coords format with colon m
too much fun to fix this.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1748472&view=rev should do the trick.
Still some doc updates required
Robert
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:10:30 +0200, Robert Scholte
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:59:50 +0200, Michael Osipov
wrote:
Am 2016-06-14 um 17:34 schrieb
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:59:50 +0200, Michael Osipov
wrote:
Am 2016-06-14 um 17:34 schrieb Robert Scholte:
I think we're making it ourself very hard if we keep supporting :jar.
I would have read it as any groupId + artifactId='jar'.
Instead with 3.0 we should switch to the patterns as defined
Am 2016-06-14 um 17:34 schrieb Robert Scholte:
I think we're making it ourself very hard if we keep supporting :jar.
I would have read it as any groupId + artifactId='jar'.
Instead with 3.0 we should switch to the patterns as defined by
Aether[1]; no need to maintain assembly specific patterns, u
I think we're making it ourself very hard if we keep supporting :jar.
I would have read it as any groupId + artifactId='jar'.
Instead with 3.0 we should switch to the patterns as defined by Aether[1];
no need to maintain assembly specific patterns, use them as is with Aether.
WDYT?
Robert
[1]
Hi folks,
I am currently investigating
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-809
After an analysis, I came to the conclusion that Maven Common Artifact
Filters apply include filters telescopic for non-wildcard patterns.
Consider this in the assembly.xml [1]:
test.project:pro
