I think the title of John's proposal is actually a bit misleading - it
refers to the runtime behaviour of the existing POM, not any change to
the way you can use the POM itself.
- Brett
On 17/06/2008, at 5:12 PM, Gilles Scokart wrote:
I have seen recently some discussion about enhancing th
I have seen recently some discussion about enhancing the dynamicity of
the pom. This is maybe a good thing for the build section in the
source pom.
I know that the discussion were about those part. But please, make
sure that this will not leak into the published pom.
When working on the dynamic
