Re: DefaultArchetype Code

2006-06-27 Thread Ole Ersoy
comments inline --- Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comments inline. > > On 6/27/06, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Brett, > > > > I've seen modello mentioned a few times on the > maven > > site, but I have not had a chance to do a head to > head > > comparison with EMF y

Re: DefaultArchetype Code

2006-06-27 Thread Milos Kleint
comments inline. On 6/27/06, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey Brett, I've seen modello mentioned a few times on the maven site, but I have not had a chance to do a head to head comparison with EMF yet, I'm sure they both do a good job at realizing the benefit of not having to update har

Re: DefaultArchetype Code

2006-06-26 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hey Brett, I've seen modello mentioned a few times on the maven site, but I have not had a chance to do a head to head comparison with EMF yet, I'm sure they both do a good job at realizing the benefit of not having to update hardcoded Strings. The reason I suggested EMF is that it can generate

Re: DefaultArchetype Code

2006-06-26 Thread Brett Porter
I thought there was already a model generated with modello in trunk? Certainly a good idea to move these out of the code, though. We're interested - just let us know what you propose before doing it :) - Brett On 26/06/2006 1:27 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote: Hey Guys, Just looking over some of the co

DefaultArchetype Code

2006-06-25 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hey Guys, Just looking over some of the code, and noticed this in DefaultArchetype. private static final String DEFAULT_TEST_RESOURCE_DIR = "/src/test/resources"; private static final String DEFAULT_TEST_SOURCE_DIR = "/src/test/java"; private static final String DEFAULT_RESOURCE_DI