Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-11-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
Nice! On 29 Nov 06, at 9:16 AM 29 Nov 06, Mark Hobson wrote: On 07/07/06, Mik Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There should be no problem. Just file a Mylar bug report with the structure you want and we can iterate from there. If the easiest way to do that is for us to build those JARs

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-11-29 Thread Mark Hobson
On 07/07/06, Mik Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There should be no problem. Just file a Mylar bug report with the structure you want and we can iterate from there. If the easiest way to do that is for us to build those JARs via Maven instead of plain Ant I'm happy to do that too. Finally

RE: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-07 Thread Jeff Jensen
sz Pik' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Maven Developers List' Subject: RE: Common API for issue tracking systems Eclipse.org provides us with an excellent download infrastructure and mirroring system, so it's probably simplest to use that. It would make bundling the JARs and ma

RE: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-07 Thread Mik Kersten
-Original Message- > From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... > Yes. But this brings up a bigger question about providing jars > in a way that Maven will be able to use (which means a repository > with given layout of directories/fiels) - is there a way to setup such > a thing on ecl

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-07 Thread Tomasz Pik
t; Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems > > On 7/7/06, Mik Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Could you please create a bug report for us to indicate how you want to > get > > this API, e.g. have a d

RE: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-07 Thread Mik Kersten
ow_bug.cgi?id=149981 Mik > -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:45 AM > To: Mik Kersten > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems > > On 7/7/06, Mik

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-07 Thread Tomasz Pik
On 7/7/06, Mik Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could you please create a bug report for us to indicate how you want to get this API, e.g. have a downloadable bin+src JAR, separate JARs, build from source? http://www.eclipse.org/mylar/bugs.php Ideally I'd like just to define, that my code d

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-06 Thread Milos Kleint
Just wondering, I'm not familiar with eclipse sourcebase. If maven uses some eclipse APIs, thus using some eclipse binaries in non-eclipse way (no osgi/plugin encapsulation) and then we use the maven binaries in an eclipse plugin, can we get in trouble? (by having 2 versions of same binaries on c

RE: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-06 Thread Mik Kersten
> -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... > So it seems that the roadmap will be: > * Mylar project will provide 'Abstraction API' for and implementations for > various trackers; Yes, Mylar will provide this via it's Tasks API which has abstractions for reposi

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-06 Thread jerome lacoste
On 7/5/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On 7/4/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That'll be the ant-that-has-to-support-java-1.2 on >> everything-and-build-with-no-dependencies, won't it? > > Be that as it may, but personally I prefer this ov

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-06 Thread Tomasz Pik
son van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:05 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: Mik Kersten > Subject: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems > > Hi, > > One person who should definitely be pulled into the discussion is Mik > Kersten. He&#x

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-05 Thread Steve Loughran
Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On 7/4/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That'll be the ant-that-has-to-support-java-1.2 on everything-and-build-with-no-dependencies, won't it? Be that as it may, but personally I prefer this over the maven-which-needs-thousands-of-jars-from-codehaus-for-wh

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-05 Thread Brett Porter
This is cool to know. You may have missed it in the dev@ thread, but Tomasz has also started this for Mantis and was hoping to contribute it to the Maven library: http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/itapi/project/trunk/ On 5/07/2006 6:24 AM, Mik Kersten wrote: It would be great to have Mave

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 05:07:47PM +0100, Mark Hobson wrote: > Hi there, > > I was wondering whether any thought had been given to an abstract > issue tracking API with implementations for Bugzilla, JIRA, etc.? > > I can see a couple of uses within maven: > > * Querying the issues fixed when rele

RE: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Mik Kersten
gs (e.g. change milestones, submit) Mik -- Mik Kersten, http://kerstens.org/mik Mylar Project Lead, http://eclipse.org/mylar > -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:05 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: Mik Kersten

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 7/4/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That'll be the ant-that-has-to-support-java-1.2 on everything-and-build-with-no-dependencies, won't it? Be that as it may, but personally I prefer this over the maven-which-needs-thousands-of-jars-from-codehaus-for-whatever approach... :-)

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Steve Loughran
Brett Porter wrote: On 4/07/2006 8:16 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any partiucular build tool if possible, primarily because you can do other things outside the build itself. Imagine apps auto-opening bugreps on system crashes, for example. None of

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 4 Jul 06, at 11:16 AM 4 Jul 06, Steve Loughran wrote: Vincent Massol wrote: +1. Actually I thought there was already a project for this but I was probably anticipating... * SCM for SCMs * Wagon for transports * Cargo for containers ... Spoor for bug trackers (or whatever other name!) -Vince

RE: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread John Allen
/QuickBuild/Continuum/AntHill/CruiseControl)John > Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:23:45 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > dev@maven.apache.org> Subject: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems> > > On 04/07/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Tomasz Pik
On 7/4/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/07/2006 8:16 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any partiucular build > tool if possible, primarily because you can do other things outside the > build itself. Imagine apps auto-opening bugreps on syst

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 4/07/2006 8:16 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any partiucular build tool if possible, primarily because you can do other things outside the build itself. Imagine apps auto-opening bugreps on system crashes, for example. None of the shared libraries

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Mark Hobson
On 04/07/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any partiucular build tool if possible, primarily because you can do other things outside the build itself. Imagine apps auto-opening bugreps on system crashes, for example. I agree, and this i

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Steve Loughran
Vincent Massol wrote: +1. Actually I thought there was already a project for this but I was probably anticipating... * SCM for SCMs * Wagon for transports * Cargo for containers ... Spoor for bug trackers (or whatever other name!) -Vincent very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any p

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Mark Hobson
On 04/07/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: An XML-RPC API is in the works. AFAIK, it's on the roadmap for Bugzilla 2.24. You're right, I wasn't aware of this thanks: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224577 Should make the bugzilla implementation *alot* easier. Mark

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 7/4/06, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: both projects could share the same abstraction. Communication with Bugzilla is rather tedious and Mylar's implementation seems quite comprehensive. An XML-RPC API is in the works. AFAIK, it's on the roadmap for Bugzilla 2.24. Jochen -- Whene

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-04 Thread Mark Hobson
Cool, good to see things are moving in that direction. I did think Mylar was the closest out there to what was needed - it'd be good if both projects could share the same abstraction. Communication with Bugzilla is rather tedious and Mylar's implementation seems quite comprehensive. Mark On 04

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-03 Thread Brett Porter
We should also mention that it has already been started in the Maven sandbox. - Brett On 4/07/2006 4:04 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, One person who should definitely be pulled into the discussion is Mik Kersten. He's the fellow who works on Mylar and has integration for Bugzilla and JIRA an

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, One person who should definitely be pulled into the discussion is Mik Kersten. He's the fellow who works on Mylar and has integration for Bugzilla and JIRA and I think Mantis. He's got some code that would definitely be of use. Mik, are you interested creating a general library for is

Re: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-03 Thread David Blevins
anticipating... * SCM for SCMs * Wagon for transports * Cargo for containers ... Spoor for bug trackers (or whatever other name!) -Vincent -Original Message- From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 3 juillet 2006 18:08 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Common API for

RE: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-03 Thread Vincent Massol
TECTED] > Sent: lundi 3 juillet 2006 18:08 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Common API for issue tracking systems > > Hi there, > > I was wondering whether any thought had been given to an abstract > issue tracking API with implementations for Bugzilla, JIRA, etc.?

Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-03 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi there, I was wondering whether any thought had been given to an abstract issue tracking API with implementations for Bugzilla, JIRA, etc.? I can see a couple of uses within maven: * Querying the issues fixed when releasing a new version of a project, to be used within the maven-changes-plugi