Nice!
On 29 Nov 06, at 9:16 AM 29 Nov 06, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 07/07/06, Mik Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There should be no problem. Just file a Mylar bug report with the
structure
you want and we can iterate from there. If the easiest way to do
that is
for us to build those JARs
On 07/07/06, Mik Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There should be no problem. Just file a Mylar bug report with the structure
you want and we can iterate from there. If the easiest way to do that is
for us to build those JARs via Maven instead of plain Ant I'm happy to do
that too.
Finally
sz Pik'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Maven Developers List'
Subject: RE: Common API for issue tracking systems
Eclipse.org provides us with an excellent download infrastructure and
mirroring system, so it's probably simplest to use that. It would make
bundling the JARs and ma
-Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> Yes. But this brings up a bigger question about providing jars
> in a way that Maven will be able to use (which means a repository
> with given layout of directories/fiels) - is there a way to setup such
> a thing on ecl
t; Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems
>
> On 7/7/06, Mik Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could you please create a bug report for us to indicate how you want to
> get
> > this API, e.g. have a d
ow_bug.cgi?id=149981
Mik
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:45 AM
> To: Mik Kersten
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems
>
> On 7/7/06, Mik
On 7/7/06, Mik Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you please create a bug report for us to indicate how you want to get
this API, e.g. have a downloadable bin+src JAR, separate JARs, build from
source? http://www.eclipse.org/mylar/bugs.php
Ideally I'd like just to define, that my code d
Just wondering, I'm not familiar with eclipse sourcebase.
If maven uses some eclipse APIs, thus using some eclipse binaries in
non-eclipse way (no osgi/plugin encapsulation) and then we use the
maven binaries in an eclipse plugin, can we get in trouble? (by having
2 versions of same binaries on c
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> So it seems that the roadmap will be:
> * Mylar project will provide 'Abstraction API' for and implementations for
> various trackers;
Yes, Mylar will provide this via it's Tasks API which has abstractions for
reposi
On 7/5/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On 7/4/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That'll be the ant-that-has-to-support-java-1.2 on
>> everything-and-build-with-no-dependencies, won't it?
>
> Be that as it may, but personally I prefer this ov
son van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:05 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc: Mik Kersten
> Subject: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems
>
> Hi,
>
> One person who should definitely be pulled into the discussion is Mik
> Kersten. He
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 7/4/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That'll be the ant-that-has-to-support-java-1.2 on
everything-and-build-with-no-dependencies, won't it?
Be that as it may, but personally I prefer this over the
maven-which-needs-thousands-of-jars-from-codehaus-for-wh
This is cool to know. You may have missed it in the dev@ thread, but
Tomasz has also started this for Mantis and was hoping to contribute it
to the Maven library:
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/itapi/project/trunk/
On 5/07/2006 6:24 AM, Mik Kersten wrote:
It would be great to have Mave
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 05:07:47PM +0100, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was wondering whether any thought had been given to an abstract
> issue tracking API with implementations for Bugzilla, JIRA, etc.?
>
> I can see a couple of uses within maven:
>
> * Querying the issues fixed when rele
gs (e.g. change milestones, submit)
Mik
--
Mik Kersten, http://kerstens.org/mik
Mylar Project Lead, http://eclipse.org/mylar
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:05 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc: Mik Kersten
On 7/4/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That'll be the ant-that-has-to-support-java-1.2 on
everything-and-build-with-no-dependencies, won't it?
Be that as it may, but personally I prefer this over the
maven-which-needs-thousands-of-jars-from-codehaus-for-whatever
approach... :-)
Brett Porter wrote:
On 4/07/2006 8:16 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any partiucular build
tool if possible, primarily because you can do other things outside
the build itself. Imagine apps auto-opening bugreps on system crashes,
for example.
None of
On 4 Jul 06, at 11:16 AM 4 Jul 06, Steve Loughran wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
+1. Actually I thought there was already a project for this but I was
probably anticipating...
* SCM for SCMs
* Wagon for transports
* Cargo for containers
... Spoor for bug trackers (or whatever other name!)
-Vince
/QuickBuild/Continuum/AntHill/CruiseControl)John
> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:23:45 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> dev@maven.apache.org> Subject: Re: Common API for issue tracking systems> >
> On 04/07/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >
On 7/4/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/07/2006 8:16 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any partiucular build
> tool if possible, primarily because you can do other things outside the
> build itself. Imagine apps auto-opening bugreps on syst
On 4/07/2006 8:16 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any partiucular build
tool if possible, primarily because you can do other things outside the
build itself. Imagine apps auto-opening bugreps on system crashes, for
example.
None of the shared libraries
On 04/07/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any partiucular build
tool if possible, primarily because you can do other things outside the
build itself. Imagine apps auto-opening bugreps on system crashes, for
example.
I agree, and this i
Vincent Massol wrote:
+1. Actually I thought there was already a project for this but I was
probably anticipating...
* SCM for SCMs
* Wagon for transports
* Cargo for containers
... Spoor for bug trackers (or whatever other name!)
-Vincent
very +1 too, though I'd like it decoupled from any p
On 04/07/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An XML-RPC API is in the works. AFAIK, it's on the roadmap for Bugzilla 2.24.
You're right, I wasn't aware of this thanks:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224577
Should make the bugzilla implementation *alot* easier.
Mark
On 7/4/06, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
both projects could share the same abstraction. Communication with
Bugzilla is rather tedious and Mylar's implementation seems quite
comprehensive.
An XML-RPC API is in the works. AFAIK, it's on the roadmap for Bugzilla 2.24.
Jochen
--
Whene
Cool, good to see things are moving in that direction. I did think
Mylar was the closest out there to what was needed - it'd be good if
both projects could share the same abstraction. Communication with
Bugzilla is rather tedious and Mylar's implementation seems quite
comprehensive.
Mark
On 04
We should also mention that it has already been started in the Maven
sandbox.
- Brett
On 4/07/2006 4:04 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
One person who should definitely be pulled into the discussion is Mik
Kersten. He's the fellow who works on Mylar and has integration for
Bugzilla and JIRA an
Hi,
One person who should definitely be pulled into the discussion is Mik
Kersten. He's the fellow who works on Mylar and has integration for
Bugzilla and JIRA and I think Mantis. He's got some code that would
definitely be of use.
Mik, are you interested creating a general library for is
anticipating...
* SCM for SCMs
* Wagon for transports
* Cargo for containers
... Spoor for bug trackers (or whatever other name!)
-Vincent
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 3 juillet 2006 18:08
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Common API for
TECTED]
> Sent: lundi 3 juillet 2006 18:08
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Common API for issue tracking systems
>
> Hi there,
>
> I was wondering whether any thought had been given to an abstract
> issue tracking API with implementations for Bugzilla, JIRA, etc.?
Hi there,
I was wondering whether any thought had been given to an abstract
issue tracking API with implementations for Bugzilla, JIRA, etc.? I
can see a couple of uses within maven:
* Querying the issues fixed when releasing a new version of a project,
to be used within the maven-changes-plugi
31 matches
Mail list logo