yes we discussed about it.
That one reason why we should not activate it by default.
We'll never find a solution that will satisfy everybody
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> I've tested this on Windows, there's only one small issue: the info-text
> is probably black, whic
Just tested it.
It's working fine
Thx a lot.
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Arnaud,
>
> It's all in there now. While I was fixing the logging in embedded mode for
> SLF4J Simple, I updated the Logback branch to do the same.
>
> I had to patch SLF4J Simple to get around s
ANSI can set the BG color...
Gary
On Dec 9, 2012, at 8:25, Robert Scholte wrote:
> I've tested this on Windows, there's only one small issue: the info-text is
> probably black, which makes it unreadable on the default background-color,
> which is black as well.
> The rest looks great!
>
> Op
I've tested this on Windows, there's only one small issue: the info-text
is probably black, which makes it unreadable on the default
background-color, which is black as well.
The rest looks great!
Op Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:47:24 +0100 schreef Olivier Lamy :
2012/12/3 Marc Pasteur :
hi,
For
Arnaud,
It's all in there now. While I was fixing the logging in embedded mode for
SLF4J Simple, I updated the Logback branch to do the same.
I had to patch SLF4J Simple to get around some static initialization that
doesn't work in embedded mode so I haven't updated trunk, but the Logback
bran
On 04.12.2012 19:18, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I've been talking to Ceki about configuration in SLF4J as there is
> really no way to change the log level without assuming an
> implementation. If that's the way then for embedding the user can
> change the SLF4J implementation but for the CLI this wil
I did that in the branches using sys props
INFO
When starting and before any slf4j access, MavenCli check -q or -X or
none of both and correctly set the value to the level
(INFO,ERROR,DEBUG)
Works fine for all slf4j impls using this naming convention.
2012/12/4 Jaso
On Dec 4, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> Jason,
>
> I'll test more later but FYI it seems that your logback branch doesn't
> support options -X/--debug
>
I've been talking to Ceki about configuration in SLF4J as there is really no
way to change the log level without assuming an
Jason,
I'll test more later but FYI it seems that your logback branch doesn't
support options -X/--debug
cheers
Arnaud
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I already have started a logback version, but I don't think this should
> affect rolling the 3.1.0.
>
> On Dec 1, 20
works fine but as someone (don't remember who... arnaud maybe) said the
color for info message is black so... not so readable on a black background
:-)
for "la vie en rose" i've to made a patch as only MAGENTA is allowed at the
moment but that could be cute :-)
it works neither in intellij nor in
I had the feedback (not tested myself) that the log4j2 (I suppose it is the
same for the logback) adds colors in netbeans console.
Arnaud
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/12/3 Marc Pasteur :
> > hi,
> >
> >
> > For the record according to log4j2 docs [1] you need some
yes it is the same thing for logback version
For sure we'll provided it by default the day we'll provide this feature.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Marc Pasteur wrote:
> hi,
>
>
> For the record according to log4j2 docs [1] you need some additional
> library to make this works on Windows.
>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/12/3 Marc Pasteur :
> > hi,
> >
> >
> > For the record according to log4j2 docs [1] you need some additional
> > library to make this works on Windows.
> > So if you don't want to display some ←[37m[ stuffs in the console
> jansi.jar
> >
2012/12/3 Marc Pasteur :
> hi,
>
>
> For the record according to log4j2 docs [1] you need some additional
> library to make this works on Windows.
> So if you don't want to display some ←[37m[ stuffs in the console jansi.jar
> mut be put on maven/lib/ext folder
>
> Can it be "by default" ?
for sur
hi,
For the record according to log4j2 docs [1] you need some additional
library to make this works on Windows.
So if you don't want to display some ←[37m[ stuffs in the console jansi.jar
mut be put on maven/lib/ext folder
Can it be "by default" ?
[1] http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual
+1
I don't think we'll have another minor release before the end of the year.
For sure it won't be included in a bug fix release.
We already release a minor release without (or so few) end-user value, we
won't start to add new feature in a bug fix release :-)
Arnaud
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:33 P
Thanks a lot to have pushed it.
I tested it with success
I like it, at least something that will improve the user experience soon.
Note : Like Olivier's branch the default logging setup has an issue because
the default color is set to black (or white) which are backgrounds colors
commonly used. Thi
I agree but sincerely I'm sure that less than 0,01% of our users will
customize their logs.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > In any case doing a choice nowadays for 3.1.0 won't prevent us to change
> it
> > in the future. I really hope that the ability to switch from a l
> In any case doing a choice nowadays for 3.1.0 won't prevent us to change it
> in the future. I really hope that the ability to switch from a logger
> implementation to another won't require several days of developments or I
> really missed something about it.
>
Well, very likely it would affect
OK, 3.1.1 or 3.1-m2 or whatever before Christmas. Let's get this fish
out of the store and move on to the next one.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Oh do please give us a color console for Christmas :)
>
> Gary
>
> On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:47, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> I alrea
Oh do please give us a color console for Christmas :)
Gary
On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:47, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I already have started a logback version, but I don't think this should
> affect rolling the 3.1.0.
>
> On Dec 1, 2012, at 6:57 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
>> I pushed the prototype de
I already have started a logback version, but I don't think this should affect
rolling the 3.1.0.
On Dec 1, 2012, at 6:57 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> I pushed the prototype developed by olivier using log4j2 in the
> branch feature/colorized-console/log4j2
> I updated with latest master changes
I pushed the prototype developed by olivier using log4j2 in the
branch feature/colorized-console/log4j2
I updated with latest master changes
You can test the distro of this code : http://cl.ly/1B1z051O0T10
Tonight I'll try to do a logback version
cheers
Arnaud
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:15 AM,
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> I just created and fixed MNG-5395 and MNG-5396, which are logger names
> enhancements from the actual values that will give value even with slf4j-
> simple
>
> These should be a starting point for more global discussion about our
> logging
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
