nloaded,
> not
> >> deployed? Deployment of artifacts to a repo I believe goes in the pom.
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 11:09 AM
Brian Fox wrote:
> 2010/4/27 Arnaud Héritier :
>> It could be better but far from perfect. Few users are reading this file and
>> are using it to create their own.
>> I think they are often copying it from the page you pointed.
>> There are several annoying things about settings from my point of vi
ent of artifacts to a repo I believe goes in the pom.
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 11:09 AM
>>> To: Maven Developers List
>>> Subject: Re: C
exus-book/reference/config-sect-managing-routes.html
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:tobr...@discursive.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:34 AM
>>> To: Maven Developers List
>>> Subject: Re: Central reposit
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Paul Gier wrote:
>
>> Would there be any problems if the central repo definition was moved
>> out of the
>> Maven internals and into the default settings.xml [1]?
>
> I assume you refer to the global settings file shipped inside the Maven
> installation directory. The o
Ah, I forgot that it's defined in the super pom. I was thinking that it was in
the code somewhere.
I think adding the central repo to the default global settings would be a good
start. Would it even need to be commented out? If it is defined in both
places, I'm assuming that the one in the sett
[mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 11:09 AM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Central repository in settings.xml
> >
> > You can't deploy to different repos via the same repo manager though
> >
> > On 27 Apri
AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Central repository in settings.xml
>
> You can't deploy to different repos via the same repo manager though
>
> On 27 April 2010 15:43, Thiessen, Todd (Todd)
> wrote:
>
> > I think you can already do what you are a
Brien [mailto:tobr...@discursive.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:34 AM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Central repository in settings.xml
> >
> > Arnaud, I run into situations where one project demands a complete
> > different s
/reference/config-sect-managing-routes.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:tobr...@discursive.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:34 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Central repository in settings.xml
>
> Arnaud, I run into si
Arnaud, I run into situations where one project demands a complete
different settings.xml than another. Assume you have a book project
that deals with a separate repo manager and set of credentials vs. a
tiny codehaus project with a separate repo man vs. an internal
corporate project with differe
>
>
>
> I think mirrors should be able to be defined inside of (settings)
> profiles. That would make it easier to deal with moving from location
> to location.
>
>
+1
If this isn't yet in our backlog for 3.x we can add it.
2010/4/27 Arnaud Héritier :
> It could be better but far from perfect. Few users are reading this file and
> are using it to create their own.
> I think they are often copying it from the page you pointed.
> There are several annoying things about settings from my point of view but
> we won't be ab
It could be better but far from perfect. Few users are reading this file and
are using it to create their own.
I think they are often copying it from the page you pointed.
There are several annoying things about settings from my point of view but
we won't be able to change before a 3.x :
- We canno
I assume you want to make it easier for people to get the correct
settings? Moving it from the super pom could have unexpected side
effects, but what if we put the default "boiler plate"[1]
configuration for that into the default settings.xml commented out? I
think this would solve the main visibil
On Apr 26, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Paul Gier wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The current behaviour in Maven is that the central repository is built into
> the
> code, and it's there unless you hack your settings.xml to disable it. This
> can
> be a bit confusing when trying to configure your settings for
Paul Gier wrote:
Would there be any problems if the central repo definition was moved out of the
Maven internals and into the default settings.xml [1]?
I assume you refer to the global settings file shipped inside the Maven
installation directory. The one issue I know about is that embedders
Hi Everyone,
The current behaviour in Maven is that the central repository is built into the
code, and it's there unless you hack your settings.xml to disable it. This can
be a bit confusing when trying to configure your settings for a repository
manager. And it's not immediately clear what orde
18 matches
Mail list logo