OTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:32 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: CI for Maven
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ci.sonatype.org for now. It is what I'm relying on while doing the
2.0.9
> release. Neither of the CI system
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ci.sonatype.org for now. It is what I'm relying on while doing the 2.0.9
> release. Neither of the CI systems are currently publishing snapshots to
> the official apache repo due to various infrastructure issues we'll wor
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:45 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: CI for Maven
So what's going to be the major CI server for Maven?
Regards,
Siahrei
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My plan is to move the rest of
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:55 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: CI for Maven
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that archiva and continuum are now building on vmbuild
> instead of maven.zone. I think it is to have a better stability. Can't
My plan is to move the rest of the stuff over to Hudson this week.
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:55 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: CI for Maven
Hi all,
I noticed that archiva and continuum are now building on
Hi all,
I noticed that archiva and continuum are now building on vmbuild
instead of maven.zone. I think it is to have a better stability. Can't
we move others build o it (plugins, core ...). Or perhaps on hudson @
Sonatype. I don't know what is the best.
Arnaud
--
..
