Re: Build failed in Hudson: Maven-2.1.x-with-bootstrap #291

2009-02-17 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Alright, I just requested infra to remove the jobs [0]. [0] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1901 According to infra, it's up to either Brian, Wendy or Jason to remove the jobs. Anyone of you three willing to push the button? Please :-) Benjamin ---

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Maven-2.1.x-with-bootstrap #291

2009-02-14 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Jason van Zyl wrote: We might as well give the resources back, I think we're well covered with the Hudson instance on the grid. Alright, I just requested infra to remove the jobs [0]. Benjamin [0] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1901

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Maven-2.1.x-with-bootstrap #291

2009-02-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
We might as well give the resources back, I think we're well covered with the Hudson instance on the grid. On 1-Feb-09, at 3:40 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Apache Hudson Server wrote: See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Maven-2.1.x-with-bootstrap/291/changes Is anybody activel

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Maven-2.1.x-with-bootstrap #291

2009-02-01 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Apache Hudson Server wrote: See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Maven-2.1.x-with-bootstrap/291/changes Is anybody actively maintaining these jobs? From the fact that it's still labelled 2.1.x but actually builds 3.x I guess not. In this case, I don't see that much value in keeping