Brett Porter wrote on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:57 PM:
>> The log shows that Maven retrieved the TableLayout without any
>> problems
> from ibiblio, but continues with an attempt to download the
> same file from the
>> local repository. I do not think this is intended.
>
> This is an existing
> The log shows that Maven retrieved the TableLayout without any problems
from ibiblio, but continues with an attempt to download the same file from
the
> local repository. I do not think this is intended.
This is an existing bug, not one introduced on the branch - you'll find it
in JIRA. Patches
> although it is possible now to build Maven in the 1.0 branch,
> I have proplems with this version. As reported before, Maven
> still claims beeing offline and reports warnings, but is also
> not able to retrieve the SNAPSHOT artifacts (tested with Jelly-SOAP):
Fixed, not committed.
> Our pro
Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:07 AM:
> although it is possible now to build Maven in the 1.0 branch,
> I have proplems with this version. As reported before, Maven
> still claims beeing offline and reports warnings, but is also
> not able to retrieve the SNAPSHOT artifacts (t
Hi Brett,
Brett Porter wrote on Friday, December 12, 2003 12:36 AM:
> These are all warnings. I will clean them up by RC2.
although it is possible now to build Maven in the 1.0 branch, I have proplems with
this version. As reported before, Maven still claims beeing offline and reports
warnings,
These are all warnings. I will clean them up by RC2.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2003 7:24 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
>
>
> Hi Brett,
&g
Hi Brett,
Brett Porter wrote on Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:44 AM:
> I just bootrapped a clean build after committing some fixes
> and it looks file. I saw these problems yesterday.
>
> The fix is a quick hack in MavenUtils.java which I will clean up next
> time round.
it looks much better to
s/file/fine/
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter
> Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2003 11:44 AM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
>
>
> I just bootrapped a clean build after committing some fixes
> an
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2003 11:48 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
>
>
> Not yet, as it is a bigger problem that I first thought. :-(
>
> I'm h
Not yet, as it is a bigger problem that I first thought. :-(
I'm hoping to get it resolved soon, but don't hold your breath today.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/12/2003
11:31:30 PM:
> [EMAI
I noticed this too - I think its fixed. More to follow.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2003 11:04 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
>
>
> It now breaks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:04 PM:
> This is caused by an empty maven.xml file.
>
> Not sure why, but I'm removing the offending file now.
Did you commit the deletion into the branch? CVS did not report any change.
Regards,
Jörg
It now breaks on a valid maven.xml in the faq plugin :-(
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/12/2003
07:36:26 PM:
> Hi,
>
> repeated the task below right now, but it is getting worse with today's
This is caused by an empty maven.xml file.
Not sure why, but I'm removing the offending file now.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/12/2003
07:36:26 PM:
> Hi,
>
> repeated the task below right
Hi,
repeated the task below right now, but it is getting worse with today's version in
CVS, since building the plugins during bootstrap failes in ashkelon. It seems one of
the changes yesterday from Brett or dIon has side-effects.
Regards,
Jörg
Jörg Schaible wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 3:59 PM:
> Did you exclude checkstyle, as Brett suggested previously?
Yes, but no difference. Results are the same as reported.
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
>>> In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offlin
Did you exclude checkstyle, as Brett suggested previously?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/12/2003
12:53:01 AM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
> > In the 1.0 b
otstrap doesn't use
this
> functionality?
>
> Emmanuel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Bootstrapping 1.0-
Emmanuel Venisse wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 3:25 PM:
> Oups.
> Add in $user.home/build.properties : maven.bootstrap.online=
> With this line, all dependencies will be downloaded.
Yeah. But, as reported, the bootstrap fails then with the touchstone stuff. While this
is expected and seems
onday, December 08, 2003 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
> try this for obtain an online bootstrap :
> %ANT_HOME%\bin\ant -Dmaven.bootstrap.online= -f build-bootstrap.xml
>
> Emmanuel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jörg Schaible" <[EMAIL PR
Original Message -
> From: "Jörg Schaible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:53 PM
> Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, Decembe
ber 08, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
> In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
>
> All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap.
Well, since I did not had any clue, what jars are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
> In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
>
> All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap.
Well, since I did not had any clue, what jars are really needed, I bootstrapped once
being online. While the build
ctionality?
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All necessary jars m
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/12/2003
11:33:56 PM:
> Hello,
>
> unfortunate
Hello,
unfortunately I have still troubles building Maven from MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH:
1) Checkout maven with MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH tag
2) Checkout maven-plugins from HEAD (the decision was made not to branch the plugins -
right?)
3) Bootstrapping in maven
Following observations during the boostrapping:
26 matches
Mail list logo
