RE: Automate testing

2005-08-24 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Brett, > This looks good. My thoughts: > - can you put more of the inspecifics into the abstract test case (eg > the setup)? Sure. > - I think the projects should be under src/test/projects, not > src/test/resources (like eclipse does). Agree. Used resources dir because projects dir already

Re: Automate testing

2005-08-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Rinku wrote: Has anyone checked out Jameleon for integration testing? http://jameleon.sourceforge.net/ Didnt know about it. I'm actually working on distributed junit stuff intermittently, where you deploy JAR files and run junit tests from them on different boxes, then correlate the result

Re: Automate testing

2005-08-23 Thread Thomas Van de Velde
/jameleon.sourceforge.net/ > > Cheers, > Rahul > > - Original Message - > From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Maven Developers List" > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:26 PM > Subject: Re: Automate testing > > > > St

Re: Automate testing

2005-08-23 Thread Brett Porter
Steve Loughran wrote: > > I think httpunit has a better reputation in the past for > quality/features; it even handles things like javascript. Yes - I always read them interchangably unfortunately, but I definitely prefer httpunit. - Brett ---

Re: Automate testing

2005-08-23 Thread Rinku
Has anyone checked out Jameleon for integration testing? http://jameleon.sourceforge.net/ Cheers, Rahul - Original Message - From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:26 PM Subject: Re: Automate

Re: Automate testing

2005-08-23 Thread Martijn Dashorst
jWebUnit is a nice htmlunit like wrapper around httpunit. When testing web apps, I only used jwebunit sofar. What kind of javascript support are you using? the latest rhino library doesn't seem to play nice with xmlhttprequest library dojo. :-( Martijn Brett Porter wrote: Steve Loughran wr

Re: Automate testing

2005-08-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi, Actually, all report tests are "handmade". I proposed here to automate testing with the testing framework htmlunit. HtmlUnit read a generated html file, parse it and determine whether all is correct. Works fine but it takes a time to process all tests. You co

Re: Automate testing

2005-08-22 Thread Brett Porter
;Hi, > >Actually, all report tests are "handmade". I proposed here to automate >testing with the testing framework htmlunit. > >HtmlUnit read a generated html file, parse it and determine whether all is >correct. Works fine but it takes a time to process all tests. >

Re: Automate testing

2005-08-08 Thread Brett Porter
Anyone have an opinion on this? As yet, I haven't had time to look... will try this week. - Brett Vincent Siveton wrote: >Hi, > >Actually, all report tests are "handmade". I proposed here to automate >testing with the testing framework htmlunit. > >HtmlUnit rea

Automate testing

2005-08-04 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi, Actually, all report tests are "handmade". I proposed here to automate testing with the testing framework htmlunit. HtmlUnit read a generated html file, parse it and determine whether all is correct. Works fine but it takes a time to process all tests. You could find a first