Re: Archetype review

2007-05-23 Thread Brett Porter
On 23/05/2007, at 9:55 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: Could that point should be marked as a non mandatory backward incompatibility ? Because i dunno how to forbid prompting behaviour unless the usage of this option. For the old goal names, we can use the default as false instead of relying

Re: Archetype review

2007-05-23 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Hi 2007/5/23, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 22/05/2007, at 5:36 AM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: > > It don't prompt when maven is called with -B I understand - but this is not the previous behaviour. Could that point should be marked as a non mandatory backward incompatibility ? Becaus

Re: Archetype review

2007-05-23 Thread Brett Porter
On 22/05/2007, at 5:36 AM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: So i did not forked, but rewrited. Some history : I must admit have inspired myself on using the artifactDownloader and use of component in plexus and a bit of modello. I first made some paper work during new year holydays. And started to

Re: Archetype review

2007-05-21 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Hi, So the long answer 2007/5/21, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This is mostly for Raphaël, but also anyone else interested in Archetype dev. So, as I understand it: - maven-archetype-1.0.x branch is no longer needed (this was for the alpha series releases before the re-arrangement / refa

Re: Archetype review

2007-05-21 Thread Carlos Sanchez
ARCHETYPE-38 is not in archetypeng for what I could see And it doesn't build for me on windows, attached is the log Tests in error: testGenerateArchetypeCompleteWithoutParent(org.codehaus.mojo.archetypeng.generator.DefaultArchetypeGeneratorTest) testGenerateArchetypeSite(org.codehaus.mojo.arch

Re: Archetype review

2007-05-21 Thread Brett Porter
On 21/05/2007, at 4:56 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: Quick answer, will answer in depth after work. Cool, np. I didn't fork from a revision, but rewrite from scratch. So, are there changes on trunk that we should be reviewing to make sure they also found their way into NG? Surely some of

Re: Archetype review

2007-05-20 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Quick answer, will answer in depth after work. Raphaël 2007/5/21, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This is mostly for Raphaël, but also anyone else interested in Archetype dev. So, as I understand it: - maven-archetype-1.0.x branch is no longer needed (this was for the alpha series releases

Archetype review

2007-05-20 Thread Brett Porter
This is mostly for Raphaël, but also anyone else interested in Archetype dev. So, as I understand it: - maven-archetype-1.0.x branch is no longer needed (this was for the alpha series releases before the re-arrangement / refactoring that only got half done last year). I've removed it. - tr