postponed until we have a clear
> understanding how we cope with pom-4.0.1 (use of xml attributes).
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Tue, 8/16/11, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
> > From: Arnaud Héritier
> > Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
> > To: &
Maven distribution with fixes
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2011, 2:21 PM
> And thus, what's new ???
> 3.0.4 is again lost somewhere ...
> Mark did you have the opportunity to work on the fix you
> wanted to ?
>
> Arnaud
>
>
>
On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> And thus, what's new ???
> 3.0.4 is again lost somewhere ...
> Mark did you have the opportunity to work on the fix you wanted to ?
>
The release is still ready to go. I'm not sure where the vote stands on the EPL
licensed 3rd party librari
And thus, what's new ???
3.0.4 is again lost somewhere ...
Mark did you have the opportunity to work on the fix you wanted to ?
Arnaud
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le jeudi 28 juillet 2011, Brett Porter a écrit :
> > On 28/07/2011, at 10:
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2011, Brett Porter a écrit :
> On 28/07/2011, at 10:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:25 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >> mom jason.
> >>
> >> Before we ship 3.0.4 I'd like to fix the SCM URL postfix problem which
> >> exists in lots of DSC
On 28 July 2011 16:18, Milos Kleint wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>> On 28 July 2011 16:03, John Casey wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/28/11 10:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> The reason why no one
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:03 AM, John Casey wrote:
>
>
> On 7/28/11 10:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>
>>> The reason why no one committed to Aether beside yourself is partly that it
>>> requires to sign some CLA which only unilaterally gr
Not sure what version you're reading but we specifically changed so that said
author retains copyright and Sonatype is granted a perpetual license. Changed
specifically when Brett brought it up, we brought it in line with what Apache
and Eclipse do.
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Stephen Connoll
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> On 28 July 2011 16:03, John Casey wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/28/11 10:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>
The reason why no one committed to Aether beside yourself is partly that
On 28 July 2011 16:03, John Casey wrote:
>
>
> On 7/28/11 10:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>
>>> The reason why no one committed to Aether beside yourself is partly that
>>> it requires to sign some CLA which only unilaterally grants rights (
u, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: "Maven Developers List"
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 1:23 PM
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Humm, guess there are only 3 options left in this
case
1.) We
n and gain experience with a
new codebase and become effective with it.
[1]:
https://github.com/sonatype/m2eclipse-egit/blob/master/org.sonatype.m2e.egit.target-platform/e37.target
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> From: Jason va
+1
Can bentmann's fixes be applied without adopting the updated version of
Aether?
On 7/28/11 10:27 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
From my POV it could be a good thing for users to at least push a 3.0.4
release with what Benj fixed.
If Mark is sure to be able to fix next week the bug he mentione
le bunnies,
but because the code is not under our control anymore!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: "Maven Developers List"
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 1:23 PM
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:
perfectly fine with me.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> From: Arnaud Héritier
> Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 2:27 PM
> From my POV it could be a goo
>From my POV it could be a good thing for users to at least push a 3.0.4
release with what Benj fixed.
If Mark is sure to be able to fix next week the bug he mentioned let's wait
him.
For Aether/Sisu and additional fixes and required dependencies I let others
active dev/pmcs decide what they want.
under our control anymore!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> From: Jason van Zyl
> Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 1:23 PM
>
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:52 AM,
On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> At the end of the day, if you really cared about the Maven users, you'd help
> us get an official Apache version of 3.0.4 out. The fact that you are
> unwilling to do what is necessary to make that happen is very frustrating to
> me.
>
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 9:32:07 AM John Casey wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not okay to even call the binary
> maven-XXX or apache-maven-XXX (unless it's a snapshot) at all without
> getting a PMC vote. I thought there were rules in our ASF release
> protocols about that.
That's ac
We will rebuild it and call it whatever you guys want. I don't know what the
rules are because they always seem to change, or what code has to be in a build
to be called this or that.
In this case we are just like anyone else in the community making a build to
fix problems because there is not
On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:59:09 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:41:16 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not okay to even call the binary
maven-XXX or apache-maven-XXX (unless it's a snapshot) at all without
getting a PMC vote. I thought there were rules in our ASF release
protocols about that.
On 7/28/11 9:18 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:
ode here I find a highly
impractical and dangerous proposal.
Path 1) doesn't preclude your participation and we've done nothing to hinder
Kristian or Herve from participating.
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> From: Jason van Zyl
grab it instantly.'
Want to send some thread references?
--benson
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Thu, 7/28/11, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> From: Benson Margulies
>> Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
>> To: "Maven Developers List&quo
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:59:09 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:41:16 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >> I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this
> >> on the user list later today.
> >
> > *THAT* I
provides those.
Also there is still the option to fork it over to apache-extras and fix it
there.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Benson Margulies wrote:
> From: Benson Margulies
> Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> D
hich we can
> incorporate into an upcoming maven-3.0.4.
>
> 3.) We fork the last ALv2 licensed Aether version back to the Maven project
> and fix the bugs ourself.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> From: Jason van Zyl
>
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:41:16 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this on the
>> user list later today.
>
> *THAT* I have a problem with.I don't consider these any different than
>
version back to the Maven project and
fix the bugs ourself.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> From: Jason van Zyl
> Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 12:32 PM
> On
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:41:16 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this on the
> user list later today.
*THAT* I have a problem with.I don't consider these any different than our
nightly snapshots or a different commercial "build" of a
On 28/07/2011, at 10:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:25 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> mom jason.
>>
>> Before we ship 3.0.4 I'd like to fix the SCM URL postfix problem which
>> exists in lots of DSCMs. Will do this in the next week.
>>
>
> You probably have 6-7 weeks bef
isu and Aether which are important for users.
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> From: Jason van Zyl
>> Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
>> To: "Maven Developers List"
>> Date: Thursday
> From: Jason van Zyl
>> Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
>> To: "Maven Developers List"
>> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 11:41 AM
>> I'll assume that this is fine and no
>> one objects. I'll announce this on the user list later
>&g
mom jason.
Before we ship 3.0.4 I'd like to fix the SCM URL postfix problem which exists
in lots of DSCMs. Will do this in the next week.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> From: Jason van Zyl
> Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
&
I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this on the
user list later today.
On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Maven PMC,
>
> Benjamin and I would like to make a distribution available that addresses
> several issues with the Apache Maven 3.0.3 release.
Maven PMC,
Benjamin and I would like to make a distribution available that addresses
several issues with the Apache Maven 3.0.3 release. We have pushed back all
bugfixes that do not involve Eclipse Aether[a] and Eclipse Sisu[b] as their
incorporation into the mainline and an official release is
36 matches
Mail list logo
