Hmm, sounds interesting.
Is there a blog post that provides any more detail on the consumer pom
concept?
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are planning on changing the pom format when we move to modelVersion
> 5.0.0 (which currently
We are planning on changing the pom format when we move to modelVersion
5.0.0 (which currently looks like a Maven 4.0 goal)
Our current plan is to get 3.2.x stabilised and perhaps roll a 3.3 line
with new features until we are in agreement over what a modelVersion 5.0.0
pom should look like.
One
One of the common complaints I hear about Maven is that the config is too
verbose, especially when compared to the attribute based dependency config
used by Ivy. Personally it doesn't worry me overly, but if the config for
dependencies/plugins where to become attribute based instead of element
base
