Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-06 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Our original intent in voting to accept the EPL licensed aether from > sonatype was that the eclipse one was taking too long, so I viewed the vote > as being both to take the eclipse one AND pragmatically take the sonatype > one until ecli

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-06 Thread Ralph Goers
On Oct 6, 2012, at 4:23 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Aether 0.9.0.M1 is now in central [1] > and Benjamin did the upgrade on his own Maven 3 branch [2] > > Question: do we need a formal vote for the upgrade of this dependency? No. > Any objection to do the upgrade without vote,

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-06 Thread Olivier Lamy
oo long, so I viewed the vote > as being both to take the eclipse one AND pragmatically take the sonatype > one until eclipse had a release. > > If others viewed it differently, they really should shout out now, or -1 > the commit > > On Saturday, 6 October 2012, Hervé BOUTEMY wro

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-06 Thread Stephen Connolly
atype one until eclipse had a release. If others viewed it differently, they really should shout out now, or -1 the commit On Saturday, 6 October 2012, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Aether 0.9.0.M1 is now in central [1] > and Benjamin did the upgrade on his own Maven 3 branch [2] > > Question: d

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-06 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Aether 0.9.0.M1 is now in central [1] and Benjamin did the upgrade on his own Maven 3 branch [2] Question: do we need a formal vote for the upgrade of this dependency? Any objection to do the upgrade without vote, given it's just a new home for a compoennt we already use? Regards, Herv

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
on. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > - Original Message - >> From: Jason van Zyl >> To: Maven Developers List >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:10 PM >> Subject: Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1 >> >> >> On Oct 2, 2012,

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-02 Thread Mark Struberg
d not work anymore under a newer maven version. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Jason van Zyl > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:10 PM > Subject: Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1 > > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Hervé BOUT

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Oct 2, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le lundi 1 octobre 2012 19:34:27 Jason van Zyl a écrit : >> On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >>> Given this milestone will be available in central repo [1], I don't see >>> any >>> problem: I created MNG-5354 to track this. >>

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le lundi 1 octobre 2012 19:34:27 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Given this milestone will be available in central repo [1], I don't see > > any > > problem: I created MNG-5354 to track this. > > Cool, thanks. > > > Of course, as requested by our de

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Given this milestone will be available in central repo [1], I don't see any > problem: I created MNG-5354 to track this. Cool, thanks. > Of course, as requested by our dependency policy [2], we need a formal vote > approved by PMC majority:

Re: Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-10-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Given this milestone will be available in central repo [1], I don't see any problem: I created MNG-5354 to track this. Of course, as requested by our dependency policy [2], we need a formal vote approved by PMC majority: this intent declaration is useful before calling for a formal vote just to

Aether 0.9.0.M1

2012-09-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'm working on the Aether Ant Tasks and in order to make them work with the new Eclipse release of Aether I had to start refactoring the the core -- maven-aether-provider specifically -- in order to make them work. If no one objects to using a milestone from Eclipse then I will make the changes