> > On one hand, we all agree that .gitignore and .gitattributes (and so
> > on) are useful when building a project (prior to the final packaging).
>
> The primary purpose of those files are git commands.
> Having them evaluated by other tools is kind of unexpected (at least for
> me)...
Well, gi
> On one hand, we all agree that .gitignore and .gitattributes (and so
> on) are useful when building a project (prior to the final packaging).
The primary purpose of those files are git commands.
Having them evaluated by other tools is kind of unexpected (at least for me)...
We already strip s
Hi,
There might be some confusion here, at least I'm a little confused
with this thread.
On one hand, we all agree that .gitignore and .gitattributes (and so
on) are useful when building a project (prior to the final packaging).
On the other hand, once the project is built is useless to have a
.
Hi,
Also apache-rat-plugin use .gitignore for skipping verification
pt., 16 wrz 2022 o 11:14 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
> Am 2022-09-16 um 11:03 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov:
> >> “.gitignore” and “.gitattributes” files
> >
> > .gitignore and .gitattributes can easily be helpful during the build,
Am 2022-09-16 um 11:03 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov:
“.gitignore” and “.gitattributes” files
.gitignore and .gitattributes can easily be helpful during the build, so it
does sound strange to exclude them.
For instance, Apache Calcite uses .gitattribute to configure that specific
files should have
>“.gitignore” and “.gitattributes” files
.gitignore and .gitattributes can easily be helpful during the build, so it
does sound strange to exclude them.
For instance, Apache Calcite uses .gitattribute to configure that specific
files should have an "executable" bit in the resulting tar.gz archive
Am 2022-09-14 um 08:48 schrieb Konrad Windszus:
I believe that all file files which are necessary for CI, SCM and others
are not required to be build in that build and are just noise. So I'd be
in favor of a PR for this.
Michael
Thanks for the comment. As such excludes are useful for all packa
> I believe that all file files which are necessary for CI, SCM and others
> are not required to be build in that build and are just noise. So I'd be
> in favor of a PR for this.
>
> Michael
Thanks for the comment. As such excludes are useful for all packaging plugins
WDYT about maintaining su
Am 2022-09-13 um 13:51 schrieb Konrad Windszus:
> Hi,
> Due to the change
https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-utils/commit/e8a8433894eae9e8f82cbba4b903508362e9322a
all releases triggered with ASF Parent 27 contain a src.zip artifact
which now also contain the previously exluded “.gitignor
Hi,
Due to the change
https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-utils/commit/e8a8433894eae9e8f82cbba4b903508362e9322a
all releases triggered with ASF Parent 27 contain a src.zip artifact which now
also contain the previously exluded “.gitignore” and “.gitattributes” files.
The descriptor definin
10 matches
Mail list logo
