t veto releases, which is
> >>> something I'd meant to add in as a reminder.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for 3.1.0-m1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
es, which is
>>> something I'd meant to add in as a reminder.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for 3.1.0-m1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>
3.1.0-m1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>
>>>>> From: Hervé BOUTEMY
>>>>> To: Maven Developers Lis
Am 12/01/12 19:03, schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
> Le samedi 1 décembre 2012 18:52:51 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
>> I would -1 any suggestion to start using the "beta" moniker again, at
>> least for the changes made this far.
> I completely agree
> would it be more a milestone, to show the "stable but work
;>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>
>>>> From: Hervé BOUTEMY
>>>> To: Maven Developers List
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Saturday, Decemb
rk Struberg wrote:
>>> +1 for 3.1.0-m1
>>>
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: Hervé BOUTEMY
>>>> To: Maven Developers List
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Sa
rue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Hervé BOUTEMY
To: Maven Developers List
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: 3.1.0 decision making
Le samedi 1 décembre 2012 18:52:51 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
I would -1 any suggestion to start using the "beta" monike
Hervé BOUTEMY
>> To: Maven Developers List
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 7:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: 3.1.0 decision making
>>
>> Le samedi 1 décembre 2012 18:52:51 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
>>> I would -1 any suggestion to start using the &qu
+1 for 3.1.0-m1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Hervé BOUTEMY
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 7:03 PM
> Subject: Re: 3.1.0 decision making
>
> Le samedi 1 décembre 2012 18:52:51 Dennis Lundberg a écrit
be a blow sometimes...
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Kristian Rosenvold
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 6:51 PM
> Subject: Re: 3.1.0 decision making
>
> Although I generally stay away from any kind of logging-discu
Le samedi 1 décembre 2012 18:52:51 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> I would -1 any suggestion to start using the "beta" moniker again, at
> least for the changes made this far.
I completely agree
would it be more a milestone, to show the "stable but work in progress" state?
3.1.0-m1?
--
First off, thanks for an excellent summary Benson!
Comments inline...
On 2012-12-01 18:30, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm writing this to move the discussion about our next release off of
> a VOTE thread, where I don't think it belongs.
>
> Let me make a little historical summary. Jason and others
Although I generally stay away from any kind of logging-discussion
(and logging in general), I'd like to add my 0.5 NOK:
The version number *is* 3.1 due to this slight compatibility change;
we need to make this clear in release announcements to control
community expectations.
If a few plugins nee
I'm writing this to move the discussion about our next release off of
a VOTE thread, where I don't think it belongs.
Let me make a little historical summary. Jason and others made a
series of significant changes to the core internals, including changes
to logging that some users of some plugins ma
14 matches
Mail list logo