Re: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 31/01/2009, at 12:52 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Brett Porter wrote: What I did was changed the IT base class to ignore -SNAPSHOT - it's irrelevant to the range consideration and allows us to be clearer (eg, use [2.0.10,) instead of (2.0.9,) for "fixed in 2.0.10"). However, we still

RE: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-30 Thread Brian E. Fox
opers List Subject: Re: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk Hi guys, maybe it's not a good descision to interfere in this thread, but the Cactus project is failing on the Apache Hudson CI server (http://hudson.zones.apache.org/), when being built with Maven 2.1-SNAPSHOT. The error message is:

Re: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-30 Thread Petar Tahchiev
Hi guys, maybe it's not a good descision to interfere in this thread, but the Cactus project is failing on the Apache Hudson CI server (http://hudson.zones.apache.org/), when being built with Maven 2.1-SNAPSHOT. The error message is: ERROR: No classworlds*.jar found in /home/hudson/apache-maven-2

Re: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-30 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: What I did was changed the IT base class to ignore -SNAPSHOT - it's irrelevant to the range consideration and allows us to be clearer (eg, use [2.0.10,) instead of (2.0.9,) for "fixed in 2.0.10"). However, we still have "2.1.0-M2-RC1 not in range [2.1.0-M2,)", i.e. the RC

Re: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-29 Thread Brett Porter
Since trunk is going to be 3.0-SNAPSHOT in between alphas, I needed to take a slightly different approach. In that case (,3.0-alpha-1) will still trigger it, but [3.0-alpha-2,) will not (for those issues that are later fixed). What I did was changed the IT base class to ignore -SNAPSHOT - i

Re: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-29 Thread Brian Fox
The range should simply skip 3.0alpha1 and 2 --Brian (mobile) On Jan 29, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: What i understand in brett's email is that its patches are for 2.1 branch but he would like to add ITs to check those fixes in 2.1. His question seems to be if he has to

Re: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-28 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
What i understand in brett's email is that its patches are for 2.1 branch but he would like to add ITs to check those fixes in 2.1. His question seems to be if he has to activate those ITs for 3.0 also ? Personnaly I would say yes but perhaps not now if you are preparing an alpha2. Perhaps it can b

Re: 2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 28-Jan-09, at 6:28 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I'm just committing a bunch of fixes. Each has the corresponding integration test, but since some were in profiles, for example, I haven't attempted to merge anything to trunk. Please don't push anything to trunk, I'll pull in anything

2.1.x enhancements/fixes and trunk

2009-01-28 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I'm just committing a bunch of fixes. Each has the corresponding integration test, but since some were in profiles, for example, I haven't attempted to merge anything to trunk. Any opinions on how to set the version in the IT? Should it stop at 2.99.99 and come back to check later, or