-2.1.x-ITs #172
There you go, we're back to normal in both Hudson and Continuum now.
On 07/07/2008, at 2:15 PM, Hudson wrote:
> See http://ci.sonatype.org/job/Maven-2.1.x-ITs/172/changes
>
>
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exi
There you go, we're back to normal in both Hudson and Continuum now.
On 07/07/2008, at 2:15 PM, Hudson wrote:
See http://ci.sonatype.org/job/Maven-2.1.x-ITs/172/changes
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bp
On 18-Apr-08, at 7:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 19/04/2008, at 12:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
If this is the only one failing then it's a Maven problem and I'm
going to merge in XBR to Plexus and then in Maven.
Can you elaborate on what this will facilitate in Maven?
Employing a more w
On 19/04/2008, at 12:32 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
If this is the only one failing then it's a Maven problem and I'm
going to merge in XBR to Plexus and then in Maven.
Can you elaborate on what this will facilitate in Maven?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bp
I fixed that test last week in maven 2.1
-john
On Apr 18, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
John, was just talking to Brian to see how many ITs were failing
with 2.1.x as I used the whole system using xbean reflect and I
only see one IT failing:
testitMNG3473
(org.apache.maven.inte
John, was just talking to Brian to see how many ITs were failing with
2.1.x as I used the whole system using xbean reflect and I only see
one IT failing:
testitMNG3473
(org.apache.maven.integrationtests.MavenITmng3473PluginReportCrash)
I'm loading this back up in Hudson as the the last run
