So that suggests that the only appropriate place to use inheritance for
the section would be in projects using a parent POM such that the
parent and these children are released at the same time. This way, I
*think*, the inherited SCM urls would be correct after the release, and
the new develop
I think that is the issue
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:37 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Maybe I misunderstood what Benjamin is saying but I believe I've run into
> this also... IIUC the situation is that the plugin and its parent pom are in
> totally unrelated svn locations and _not_
Maybe I misunderstood what Benjamin is saying but I believe I've run
into this also... IIUC the situation is that the plugin and its parent
pom are in totally unrelated svn locations and _not_ including the svn
tag in the plugin results in _completely incorrect and meaningless_
scm info in
It sounds more like problems in particular plugins. Restating the SCM
URL is a bad thing and we should make it so that it can be used
reliably. If certain plugins are not dealing with it correctly then
those need to be fixed soon.
On 11-Aug-08, at 11:41 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Brian
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Seems fishy to me as well. We have inheritance for a reason.
Over at Mojo I suggested adding several times for the following
reason. Most of the time, a plugin inherits from a released parent whose
SCM URL points to its tag, say
repo/tags/parent-1
Now, running "mvn si
Seems fishy to me as well. We have inheritance for a reason.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 1:53 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: element in plugin POMs
2008/8/11, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
2008/8/11, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 11-Aug-08, at 10:29 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
>
>
> > 2008/8/11, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > about 2/3 of the plugin POMs have a element, the others can
> > > apparently live well without. Maybe we could de
On 11-Aug-08, at 10:29 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
2008/8/11, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
about 2/3 of the plugin POMs have a element, the others can
apparently live well without. Maybe we could decide for one of these
approaches to have things consistent. How do we want to han
2008/8/11, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> about 2/3 of the plugin POMs have a element, the others can
> apparently live well without. Maybe we could decide for one of these
> approaches to have things consistent. How do we want to handle this, delete
> the SCM stuff from them or
Hi,
about 2/3 of the plugin POMs have a element, the others can
apparently live well without. Maybe we could decide for one of these
approaches to have things consistent. How do we want to handle this,
delete the SCM stuff from them or add it to all POMs? WDYT?
Benjamin
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
