I should vote...
Brett Porter wrote:
>[X] +1 - I like it
>[ ] +0 - I am not opposed, but I don't mind another technique either
>[ ] -1 - I don't like it, we should have gone with _
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Brett Porter wrote:
+1,
but having lots and lots of beta's is going to look bad to people not
knowing why we do it. ;)
-- Kenney
> This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
>
> As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
>
[X] +1 - I like it
[ ] +0 - I am not opposed, but I don't mind another technique either
[ ] -1 - I don't like it, we should have gone with _
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Brett Porter wrote:
This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
Mondays, a vote will be held in conjunction with testing. These vo
+1
Vincent
2005/9/21, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
>
> As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
> to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
> Mondays, a vote will be
On 9/22/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ ] +1 - I like it
> [ ] +0 - I am not opposed, but I don't mind another technique either
> [ ] -1 - I don't like it, we should have gone with _
>
+1
fabrizio
-
To unsu
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:05 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
>
> As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
> to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
> Mondays, a vote will be h
+1
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:05 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
>
> As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
> to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
> Mondays, a vote will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
| This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
|
| As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
| to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
| Mondays,
+1
On 9/22/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
>
> As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
> to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
> Mondays, a vote will be h
+1
Arnaud
On 9/22/05, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
> > This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
> >
> > As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
> > to move to weekly beta releases un
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter wrote:
This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
Mondays, a vote will be held in conjunction with testi
+1
On 9/21/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
>
> As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
> to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
> Mondays, a vote will be h
This vote will close after 72 hours and requires 3 binding votes.
As proposed and based on a massive (2) amount of feedback, I would like
to move to weekly beta releases until 2.0. The release will be cut on
Mondays, a vote will be held in conjunction with testing. These votes
will only be open fo
14 matches
Mail list logo
