Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 09:20 +0100, Kenney Westerhof wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Kenney Westerhof wrote: > > I'm obviously too late again :) > > Btw, why is it that when the vote was called the bootstrap still failed, > but 23 hours later it succeeds? I needed to make a release to fix the prob

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-30 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Kenney Westerhof wrote: I'm obviously too late again :) Btw, why is it that when the vote was called the bootstrap still failed, but 23 hours later it succeeds? Shouldn't a call for a vote 'prove' a problem has been fixed at that moment? -- Kenney > On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Jas

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-30 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Jason van Zyl wrote: +1, on one condition, that continuum can build m2 without failing :) I don't see the bootstrap succeeding yet.. > Hi, > > I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugin (along with a release > of surefire itself) to fix a bug that caused the bootstrap

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
Not a problem. This emphasises for me the importance of getting JIRA for plugins sorted out so we can all have the same expectations about what will constitute the next release. I understand Andy is working on his own time, but I think someone needs to help him out to get it across the line. I

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-29 Thread jerome lacoste
On 10/29/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 17:00 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > > -0. I'd rather leave the "2.0" notation for one that includes forking > > (which I thought we'd have for surefire 1.4 but it seems to have gone > > silent). Let's push to finish that t

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 17:00 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > -0. I'd rather leave the "2.0" notation for one that includes forking > (which I thought we'd have for surefire 1.4 but it seems to have gone > silent). Let's push to finish that this week. It already went out a couple hours ago. I will ma

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
-0. I'd rather leave the "2.0" notation for one that includes forking (which I thought we'd have for surefire 1.4 but it seems to have gone silent). Let's push to finish that this week. If it is 2.0-beta-X, +1. - Brett Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugi

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-28 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 Lukas Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugin (along with a release of surefire itself) to fix a bug that caused the bootstrap to fail. The bootstrap failing was caused by a bad POM which in turn revealed a bug in surefire. I also applied a batch to prevent

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-28 Thread Carlos Sanchez
+1 On 10/28/05, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On 10/28/05, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Emmanuel > > > > Jason van Zyl a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugin (along with a release > > > of surefire it

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-28 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 On 10/28/05, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > Emmanuel > > Jason van Zyl a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugin (along with a release > > of surefire itself) to fix a bug that caused the bootstrap to fail. The > > bootstrap failing was c

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel Jason van Zyl a écrit : Hi, I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugin (along with a release of surefire itself) to fix a bug that caused the bootstrap to fail. The bootstrap failing was caused by a bad POM which in turn revealed a bug in surefire. I also applied a batch to p

Re: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-28 Thread John Casey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Jason van Zyl wrote: | Hi, | | I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugin (along with a release | of surefire itself) to fix a bug that caused the bootstrap to fail. The | bootstrap failing was caused by a bad POM which in turn revealed a bu

RE: [vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-28 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: vendredi 28 octobre 2005 22:54 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: [vote] surefire plugin release > > Hi, > > I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugin (along with a

[vote] surefire plugin release

2005-10-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I'd like to cut a release of the surefire plugin (along with a release of surefire itself) to fix a bug that caused the bootstrap to fail. The bootstrap failing was caused by a bad POM which in turn revealed a bug in surefire. I also applied a batch to prevent abstract test cases from running.