>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 8:09 AM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [vote] replace surefire and surefire plugin trunk with test
> > NG branches
> >
Tue but can test later on and report my
> experience.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 8:09 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [vote] replace surefire and surefire plugin trunk with
pers List
Subject: Re: [vote] replace surefire and surefire plugin trunk with test
NG branches
Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been doing the revolutionary thing with surefire. The branch is
> now working for pojo, junit and testNG tests, under all 3 fork modes.
> Some ot
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I've been doing the revolutionary thing with surefire. The branch is now
working for pojo, junit and testNG tests, under all 3 fork modes. Some
other bugs have been fixed, the surefire and junit classloaders are
separate to avoid plexus-utils and junit version clashes (t
BTW, to those testing it:
a) add this to your POM
apache.snapshots
http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository
apache.snapshots
http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository
b) build it. But make sure you use -Dmaven.test.skip=true the first time
on surefire i
Hi,
I've been doing the revolutionary thing with surefire. The branch is now
working for pojo, junit and testNG tests, under all 3 fork modes. Some
other bugs have been fixed, the surefire and junit classloaders are
separate to avoid plexus-utils and junit version clashes (this doesn't
happen for
