Where are we with this plugin? I'll check jira, but I wanted to get a
feel from those involved to see how stable it is. I know there were
things happening to this plugin during apachecon, but I dunno whether
those were intended to make this release, or if so, whether they're
committed and stabl
The checkstyle plugin for m1 has a 2.0 release from long time ago.
There won't be conflicts as m1 plugins don't go to m2 repos.
On 12/1/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded checkstyle 4.0 to the repo, and a jira issue was created
> to provide the pom needed MEV-242.
>
> On
The checkstyle plugin 2.0 already exists in m1. Which release will you
create to not create a conflict ?
Arnaud
On 12/1/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've uploaded checkstyle 4.0 to the repo, and a jira issue was created
> to provide the pom needed MEV-242.
>
> On 12/1/05, Fa
I've uploaded checkstyle 4.0 to the repo, and a jira issue was created
to provide the pom needed MEV-242.
On 12/1/05, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Java 1.5 support alone really worth upgrading, I would prefer
> upgrading the dependency to checkstyle 4 before a release, new
> feat
Java 1.5 support alone really worth upgrading, I would prefer
upgrading the dependency to checkstyle 4 before a release, new
features will come later.
fabrizio
On 12/1/05, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Looking at it briefly, there are some new features that we'd
> have to wire
Agreed. Looking at it briefly, there are some new features that we'd
have to wire into the plugin in order to make it worthwhile. We'll leave
it for another release.
Cool with everyone?
-j
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Checkstyle 4.0 is a major release that, among other things, include
(preliminary
Checkstyle 4.0 is a major release that, among other things, include
(preliminary) support for Java 1.5 code constructs. It also requires
Java 1.4 to run. Changes have been made to the public API. My suggestion
would be to wait a while before updating the dependency until the impact
it has on th
+1
On 12/1/05, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> fabrizio
>
> On 11/29/05, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I wanted to call a vote on releasing the next version of the checkstyle
> > plugin. I'm currently working on some major bugfixes, includin
+1
fabrizio
On 11/29/05, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to call a vote on releasing the next version of the checkstyle
> plugin. I'm currently working on some major bugfixes, including custom
> rulesets and configurations, more robust error handling for missing
> -Original Message-
> From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 29 novembre 2005 06:36
> To: Maven 2 Developers List
> Subject: [vote] release maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.0-beta-2
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to call a vote on releasing the nex
John Casey wrote:
Alright, we have a new opportunity here: Checkstyle 4.0 has been released.
Should we update the version while we're at it, or save that for the
next release? I'm not entirely sure what's involved, as I haven't
checked out checkstyle 4.0 yet...
If it's a drop in replacement
I think we can update it to 4.0.
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Alright, we have a new opportunity here: Checkstyle 4.0 has been released.
Should we update the version while we're at it, or save that for the
next release? I'm not entirely sure what's involved, as I haven't
checked out checkst
Alright, we have a new opportunity here: Checkstyle 4.0 has been released.
Should we update the version while we're at it, or save that for the
next release? I'm not entirely sure what's involved, as I haven't
checked out checkstyle 4.0 yet...
-john
John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
I wanted
+1
arnaud
On 11/29/05, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to call a vote on releasing the next version of the checkstyle
> plugin. I'm currently working on some major bugfixes, including custom
> rulesets and configurations, more robust error handling for missing
A very definite +1
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 29-11-2005 20:22:50:
> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 16:38 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
> > (m2-dev list doesn't exist any more :)
> >
> > +1 for a beta including these.
>
> +1
>
> > When we get to releasing
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 16:38 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
> (m2-dev list doesn't exist any more :)
>
> +1 for a beta including these.
+1
> When we get to releasing a final, let's have it finished and offered for
> testing first, before voting on the release though.
>
> - Brett
>
> John Casey wrot
+1
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I wanted to call a vote on releasing the next version of the checkstyle
plugin. I'm currently working on some major bugfixes, including custom
rulesets and configurations, more robust error handling for missing
locale resource bundles, and a couple
John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
I wanted to call a vote on releasing the next version of the checkstyle
plugin. I'm currently working on some major bugfixes, including custom
rulesets and configurations, more robust error handling for missing
locale resource bundles, and a couple other things (tr
Right, deleted that card from my address book. :)
Brett Porter wrote:
(m2-dev list doesn't exist any more :)
+1 for a beta including these.
When we get to releasing a final, let's have it finished and offered for
testing first, before voting on the release though.
- Brett
John Casey wrote:
I give this idea a +10!
we have another presentation on thurs,
following our successful presentation last week, and a almost-properly
working checkstyle plugin would add icing to the cake.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29-11-2005
06:38:36:
> (m2-dev l
(m2-dev list doesn't exist any more :)
+1 for a beta including these.
When we get to releasing a final, let's have it finished and offered for
testing first, before voting on the release though.
- Brett
John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to call a vote on releasing the next version
Hi everyone,
I wanted to call a vote on releasing the next version of the checkstyle
plugin. I'm currently working on some major bugfixes, including custom
rulesets and configurations, more robust error handling for missing
locale resource bundles, and a couple other things (trying to trim the
li
22 matches
Mail list logo
