RE : RE : RE : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1

2004-07-13 Thread Heritier Arnaud
I saw that you corrected your problem. Thanks. Arnaud > -Message d'origine- > De : Heritier Arnaud > Envoyé : mardi 13 juillet 2004 14:38 > À : Maven Developers List > Objet : RE : RE : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1 > > > Ok, I will try to study this two

RE : RE : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1

2004-07-13 Thread Heritier Arnaud
Ok, I will try to study this two problems tonight. Arnaud > -Message d'origine- > De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mardi 13 juillet 2004 14:13 > À : Maven Developers List > Objet : Re: RE : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1 > > > D

Re: RE : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1

2004-07-13 Thread Brett Porter
Message d'origine- > > De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Envoyé : mardi 13 juillet 2004 03:09 > > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Objet : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1 > > > > > > There was a regression in 1.6 that caused the j

RE : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1

2004-07-13 Thread Heritier Arnaud
?? Arnaud > -Message d'origine- > De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mardi 13 juillet 2004 03:09 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1 > > > There was a regression in 1.6 that caused the javadoc to fail > hard when no

Re: [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1

2004-07-13 Thread Dion Gillard
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:08:39 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There was a regression in 1.6 that caused the javadoc to fail hard when no > sources were found (check-needed had a bug). > > The patch I will apply is attached when I have CVS access tonight, and then will > release Jav

RE: [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1

2004-07-12 Thread Arnaud Heritier
+1, Sorry I didn't see this bug :-( Arnaud > -Message d'origine- > De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mardi 13 juillet 2004 03:09 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1 > > There was a regression in 1.6 that

Re: [vote] release javadoc 1.6.1

2004-07-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 21:08, Brett Porter wrote: > There was a regression in 1.6 that caused the javadoc to fail hard when no > sources were found (check-needed had a bug). > > The patch I will apply is attached when I have CVS access tonight, and then will > release Javadoc 1.6.1. > > Is everyon

[vote] release javadoc 1.6.1

2004-07-12 Thread Brett Porter
There was a regression in 1.6 that caused the javadoc to fail hard when no sources were found (check-needed had a bug). The patch I will apply is attached when I have CVS access tonight, and then will release Javadoc 1.6.1. Is everyone in agreeance? +1 from me. Cheers, Brett ---