Vote results:
eclipse m2 plugin:
binding: +6 - committers: +4
(none of the open issues should be considered critical, most of them
are feature requests/enhancements and at the current status the m2
plugin is already more complete and stable than its m1 counterpart)
eclipse m1 plugin:
binding: +6
> plugins:
> >
> > - m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
> > the current released version has a list of show stopper bugs: wtp
> > support and multiproject are broken, dependencies with system scope
> > have a wrong path, source jars are not added also if already available
> > in the local repository and some mo
+3
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Hi devs
I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2 plugins:
- m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
the current released version has a list of show stopper bugs: wtp
support and multiproject are broken, dependencies with system scope
have a wrong path, source
+3, especially the m1 eclise plugin!
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 11/28/05, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +3
>
> Lukas
>
>
> Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> > Hi devs
> > I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2
> plugins:
> >
> > - m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
> > the current
+3
Lukas
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Hi devs
I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2 plugins:
- m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
the current released version has a list of show stopper bugs: wtp
support and multiproject are broken, dependencies with system scope
have a wrong path,
[ +1] m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
[ +0] maven1 eclipse plugin 1.10
[ +0] maven1 jira plugin 1.2
Vincent
2005/11/27, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi devs
> I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2 plugins:
>
> - m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
> the current released version h
+3
Emmanuel
Fabrizio Giustina a écrit :
Hi devs
I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2 plugins:
- m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
the current released version has a list of show stopper bugs: wtp
support and multiproject are broken, dependencies with system scope
have a wrong
+1 for all
On 11/27/05, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi devs
> I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2 plugins:
>
> - m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
> the current released version has a list of show stopper bugs: wtp
> support and multiproject are broken, depende
ditto Jason's feedback on the open issues, +1 * 3 otherwise.
is v1.10 going to be problematic with any hokey version comparisons?
- Brett
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
>> Hi devs
>> I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2
>> plugins:
>>
>> - m2 eclipse
>
>
> Vote is open for 72 hours as usual. I'll start with a (non
> binding) +1 for all.
>
> [ +1] m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
> [ +1] maven1 eclipse plugin 1.10
> [ +1] maven1 jira plugin 1.2
Arnaud
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Hi devs
I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2 plugins:
- m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
the current released version has a list of show stopper bugs: wtp
support and multiproject are broken, dependencies with system scope
have a wrong path, source jars
Hi devs
I would like to start a vote for the release of a couple of m1/m2 plugins:
- m2 eclipse plugin 2.0
the current released version has a list of show stopper bugs: wtp
support and multiproject are broken, dependencies with system scope
have a wrong path, source jars are not added also if alre
I've delayed this as I've synced up all the versions. While the releases
against the new versions will work with beta-3, I need to wait for the
beta-4 release tomorrow first.
If this sounds problematic to anyone, I can release from an earlier
point but given the need to release again this week, I
> [ ] install plugin 2.0-rc1
+1
> [ ] deploy plugin 2.0-rc1
+0
> [ ] assembly plugin 2.0-beta-2
+1
> [ ] site plugin 2.0-beta-3
+1
> [ ] javadoc 2.0-beta-2
+1
Cheers,
Vincent
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
+0 for all
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2005 19:01
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : [vote] plugin releases this week
>
> Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
| Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1 (have
| issues). Open for 72 hours... (X in the box means +1, empty or omitted
| plugin is +0)
|
|
| [ ] install plugin 2.0-rc1
| [ ] deploy plugin 2.0-rc1
| [ ] as
+0
On 10/4/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1 (have
> issues). Open for 72 hours... (X in the box means +1, empty or omitted
> plugin is +0)
>
>
> [ ] install plugin 2.0-rc1
> [ ] deploy plugin 2.0-rc1
> [ ] assembly plugin 2.
+0 to all
On 10/4/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1 (have
> issues). Open for 72 hours... (X in the box means +1, empty or omitted
> plugin is +0)
>
>
> [ ] install plugin 2.0-rc1
> [ ] deploy plugin 2.0-rc1
> [ ] assembly pl
+0
- Lukas
Brett Porter wrote:
Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1 (have
issues). Open for 72 hours... (X in the box means +1, empty or omitted
plugin is +0)
[ ] install plugin 2.0-rc1
[ ] deploy plugin 2.0-rc1
[ ] assembly plugin 2.0-beta-2
[ ] site plugin 2.0-beta-3
+0 to all.
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 4 octobre 2005 19:01
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] plugin releases this week
>
> Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1 (hav
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1 (have
issues). Open for 72 hours... (X in the box means +1, empty or omitted
plugin is +0)
[ ] install plugin 2.0-rc1
[ ] deploy plugin 2.0-rc1
[ ] assembly plugin 2.0-beta-2
[ ] site plugin 2.0-be
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 03:01 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1 (have
> issues). Open for 72 hours... (X in the box means +1, empty or omitted
> plugin is +0)
>
>
> [ ] install plugin 2.0-rc1
> [ ] deploy plugin 2.0-rc1
> [ ] assembly plugin 2
Please vote +1 (tested, agree), +0 (trust the consensus), -1 (have
issues). Open for 72 hours... (X in the box means +1, empty or omitted
plugin is +0)
[ ] install plugin 2.0-rc1
[ ] deploy plugin 2.0-rc1
[ ] assembly plugin 2.0-beta-2
[ ] site plugin 2.0-beta-3
[ ] javadoc 2.0-beta-2
- Brett
-
[+1] JDiff
[+1] XDoc
[+1] PDF
[+1] FAQ
Emmanuel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dimanche 4 septembre 2005 03:43
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [vote] plugin releases
>
> [+1] JDiff
> [+1] XDoc
> [+1] PDF
>
+1 for everything, although I'd add a better description to the jDiff
plugin (at http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/) and at the
plugin main page.
On 9/3/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [+1] JDiff
> [+1] XDoc
> [+1] PDF
> [+1] FAQ
>
> Thanks all.
>
> - Brett
>
> ---
[+1] JDiff
[+1] XDoc
[+1] PDF
[+1] FAQ
Thanks all.
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: RE : [vote] plugin releases
>
>
> I'm ok with it as long as we're documented it as a removal of
> functionality along with the fixing of bugs.
>
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:53:42 +0200, Arnaud Heritier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 1:10 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] plugin releases
>
>
> Doesn't seem so long since I was last doing this :)
>
> I would like
> If it's ok, I'll do it tomorrow.
>
> Arnaud.
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : jeudi 8 juillet 2004 15:07
> > À : Maven Developers List
> > Objet : Re: RE : [vote] plugi
st
> Objet : Re: RE : [vote] plugin releases
>
> Can you release it when ready? Thanks.
>
> - Brett
>
> Quoting Heritier Arnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hello Brett.
> >
> > Can you wait 2 or 3 days before to release the javadoc plugin.
> >
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:07:20 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is on plugin:download?
Yep.
> Right - I don't think I had that in CVS when I compiled the list.
>
> If you want to do a point release for it, that'd be fine. I'm really keen for
> the plugins to released on their
This is on plugin:download?
Right - I don't think I had that in CVS when I compiled the list.
If you want to do a point release for it, that'd be fine. I'm really keen for
the plugins to released on their own merits and Maven just bundle the latest.
Now that the interactions and Maven API is stab
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:21:34 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I think the plugin plugin has changed too.
No.
Prompt for artifactId, groupId and version if missing.
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---
Can you release it when ready? Thanks.
- Brett
Quoting Heritier Arnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Brett.
>
> Can you wait 2 or 3 days before to release the javadoc plugin.
>
> I would like to remove the usage of sourceModifications which creates a lot
> of problems.
>
> I think it is the be
Quoting Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm happy to do changes to the latka plugin if u like, and release it.
That'd be great. I haven't had a chance to test all those yet (was going to), so
I'd appreciate it if you could check the commons-* upgrade didn't break anything.
> I think the plug
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 21:10:15 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't seem so long since I was last doing this :)
>
> I would like to release the following plugins as they've had reasonable changes
> artifact
> gump
> javadoc
> jcoverage
> xdoc
>
> Also, I'd like to release the fo
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 7 juillet 2004 13:10
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : [vote] plugin releases
>
> Doesn't seem so long since I was last doing this :)
>
> I would like to rel
'
> Subject: RE: [vote] plugin releases
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: mercredi 7 juillet 2004 13:10
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: [vote] plugin releases
> >
>
- Original Message -
From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 1:10 PM
Subject: [vote] plugin releases
> Doesn't seem so long since I was last doing this :)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 7 juillet 2004 13:10
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] plugin releases
>
> Doesn't seem so long since I was last doing this :)
>
> I would like to release
Brett Porter wrote on Wednesday, July 07, 2004 1:10 PM:
> Doesn't seem so long since I was last doing this :)
>
> I would like to release the following plugins as they've had
> reasonable changes artifact gump javadoc jcoverage xdoc
Please include MPXDOC-80. It is very small and allows a single
After that I'll close the issues MPJAVADOC-28 and MPJAVADOC-29.
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 7 juillet 2004 13:10
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : [vote] plugin releases
>
>
> Does
Doesn't seem so long since I was last doing this :)
I would like to release the following plugins as they've had reasonable changes
artifact
gump
javadoc
jcoverage
xdoc
Also, I'd like to release the following quietly to update the commons-*
dependencies and reduce the download size of "maven site
44 matches
Mail list logo
