> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 2:55 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [vote] demote plugins
>
> Michal Maczka wrote:
>
> >
> > I am using javacc in production in
Brett Porter wrote:
A single +1 indicates agreement to all of the below. Otherwise, please
+1 - I don't use any of them neither and I believe/agree what you said.
(my only exception would be Jira maybe - I used it a couple of months
ago and it seemed to be working fine, so I'm +0 for this on
On 6/14/05, Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
>
> > javacc - experimental at best, no maintainer
>
> I am using javacc in production in couple of project and it actually
> works like charm for me (I am not using jjtree). Docs are definitly not
> up to date. I know tha
Michal Maczka wrote:
I am using javacc in production in couple of project and it actually
works like charm for me (I am not using jjtree). Docs are definitly
not up to date. I know that there is more people using it. So if I
could cast no binding, user vote for that plugin it would be: -1.
+1 to all
Vincent
2005/6/11, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be moved back
> to the sandbox, and will not be distributed with Maven 1.1. Any with no
> open bugs in JIRA will have their project deleted (we should work on a
> server side
Brett Porter wrote:
Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be moved back
to the sandbox, and will not be distributed with Maven 1.1. Any with
no open bugs in JIRA will have their project deleted (we should work
on a server side solution to toss all the others into a sandbox b
+1
Arnaud
>
> Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be
> moved back to the sandbox, and will not be distributed with
> Maven 1.1. Any with no open bugs in JIRA will have their
> project deleted (we should work on a server side solution to
> toss all the others into a sandb
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 17:37 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be moved back
> to the sandbox, and will not be distributed with Maven 1.1. Any with no
> open bugs in JIRA will have their project deleted (we should work on a
> server side solutio
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 17:37 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be moved back
> to the sandbox, and will not be distributed with Maven 1.1. Any with no
> open bugs in JIRA will have their project deleted (we should work on a
> server side solutio
s, and
why they are in the sandbox. E.g. I intend to use the docbook plugin soon,
and I say "thanks for the tip" to use the SF one instead. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 1:00 PM
To: Maven Developers List
S
+1
About jira and simian I'm using them to generate reports (although I
don't look them usually) and they are working correctly.
Regards
Carlos Sanchez
On 6/11/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be moved back
> to the sandbox,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 04:08:44PM +, Lukas Theussl wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> >outstanding issues - bugs & feature requests:
> >docbook - superseded by the SF one, I believe
> >javacc - experimental at best, no maintainer
> >jdee - no idea how to test it, no maintainer
> >jdeveloper -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
This is a step in the right direction. These plugins can be revived if
someone is willing to maintain them, and presently they drag down the
perceived value of maven plugins as a whole. I know that in times past
I've been reluctant to try new plugi
Brett Porter wrote:
outstanding issues - bugs & feature requests:
docbook - superseded by the SF one, I believe
javacc - experimental at best, no maintainer
jdee - no idea how to test it, no maintainer
jdeveloper - no maintainer
junitdoclet - no maintainer
latex - not being maintained
latka - no
Brett Porter wrote:
Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be moved back
to the sandbox, and will not be distributed with Maven 1.1. Any with no
open bugs in JIRA will have their project deleted (we should work on a
server side solution to toss all the others into a sandbox
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 05:37:48PM +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be moved back
> to the sandbox, and will not be distributed with Maven 1.1. Any with no
> open bugs in JIRA will have their project deleted (we should work on a
> server side
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: samedi 11 juin 2005 09:38
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] demote plugins
[snip]
> no outstanding issues:
> ashkelon - unmaintained, no idea if it works
> wizard - doesn
Please vote on demoting the following plugins. They will be moved back
to the sandbox, and will not be distributed with Maven 1.1. Any with no
open bugs in JIRA will have their project deleted (we should work on a
server side solution to toss all the others into a sandbox bug project
and delete
18 matches
Mail list logo
